Todd:Journal Impact Factors: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Matthew Todd (talk | contribs) (added first batch of IFs) |
Matthew Todd (talk | contribs) (added a few) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73<br> | Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73<br> | ||
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. (2011): 2.52<br> | |||
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48<br> | Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48<br> | ||
Chem. Rev. (2010): 33.04<br> | |||
Chem. Soc. Rev (2011): 28.8<br> | |||
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21<br> | Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21<br> | ||
Inorg. Chem. (2010): 4.33<br> | |||
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02<br> | J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02<br> | ||
J. Med. Chem. (2010): 5.21<br> | |||
J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00<br> | J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00<br> | ||
Nature Biotech. (2010): 31.09<br> | |||
Nature Chem. (2010): 17.93<br> | |||
Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25<br> | Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25<br> | ||
PLoS ONE (2010): 4.41<br> | |||
PLoS NTD (2010?): 4.69<br> | |||
Pure Appl. Chem. (2011): 2.79<br> | |||
I know there are no links to prove the numbers above. |
Latest revision as of 22:18, 22 July 2012
When writing grants in Australia it is obligatory to talk about journal impact factors. A relevant list: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73 I know there are no links to prove the numbers above. |