Todd:Journal Impact Factors

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(added chem rev)
Current revision (01:18, 23 July 2012) (view source)
(added a few)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73<br>
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73<br>
 +
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. (2011): 2.52<br>
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48<br>
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48<br>
Chem. Rev. (2010): 33.04<br>
Chem. Rev. (2010): 33.04<br>
 +
Chem. Soc. Rev (2011): 28.8<br>
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21<br>
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21<br>
Inorg. Chem. (2010): 4.33<br>
Inorg. Chem. (2010): 4.33<br>
Line 19: Line 21:
PLoS ONE (2010): 4.41<br>
PLoS ONE (2010): 4.41<br>
PLoS NTD (2010?): 4.69<br>
PLoS NTD (2010?): 4.69<br>
 +
Pure Appl. Chem. (2011): 2.79<br>
I know there are no links to prove the numbers above.
I know there are no links to prove the numbers above.

Current revision

Home        Contact        Internal        People        Papers        Research        Teaching        Links        News        Construction       


When writing grants in Australia it is obligatory to talk about journal impact factors. A relevant list:

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2010): 12.73
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. (2011): 2.52
Chem. Eur. J. (2010): 5.48
Chem. Rev. (2010): 33.04
Chem. Soc. Rev (2011): 28.8
Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2010): 3.21
Inorg. Chem. (2010): 4.33
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010): 9.02
J. Med. Chem. (2010): 5.21
J. Org. Chem. (2010): 4.00
Nature Biotech. (2010): 31.09
Nature Chem. (2010): 17.93
Org. Lett. (2010): 5.25
PLoS ONE (2010): 4.41
PLoS NTD (2010?): 4.69
Pure Appl. Chem. (2011): 2.79

I know there are no links to prove the numbers above.

Personal tools