User:Alexander L. Davis/Notebook/Backdating/2013/03/24: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 13: Line 13:


==Unexpected Observations==
==Unexpected Observations==
*Insert content here...  
* This person gave 100% for both P(theory) judgments. I don't know how to explain this.


==New Hypotheses==
==New Hypotheses==

Revision as of 05:01, 25 March 2013

Project name <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Entry title

  • Pretesting second participant.

Comments

  • Insert content here...

Unexpected Observations

  • This person gave 100% for both P(theory) judgments. I don't know how to explain this.

New Hypotheses

  • Insert content here...

Current Protocol

  • Insert content here...

Current Materials

  • Insert content here...

New Data

Participant 2

  • Wordiness, especially "perception of energy prices"
  • Didn't understand inflation note.
  • Delete for 6 different years.

Faults

  • Person gave 100% confidence both times, a serious problem. Why would the person do this?
  • Person gave slowly increasing coal prices, but said they are steady. Again, this seems like an inflation argument.
  • Person did not make predictions.

Corrections

  • Removed "perception of energy prices" from introduction.
  • Deleted "for 6 different years"
  • Fix inflation note to: "the prices have already been adjusted for inflation" from "these are real coal prices, meaning the prices have been adjusted for inflation"