User:Alexander L. Davis/Notebook/Backdating/2013/03/30: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 31: Line 31:
* Didn't understand the inflation note.
* Didn't understand the inflation note.
* Didn't understand the inflation attention check.
* Didn't understand the inflation attention check.
* The quality of explanation is still very low.


==Corrections==
==Corrections==
*Insert content here...
* Simplified both the inflation note and the inflation attention check.
 


<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->

Revision as of 07:35, 31 March 2013

Project name <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Entry title

  • Participant 4

Comments

  • The method does not seem strong enough to detect the backdating effect. Updating and backdating go in the same direction in this study, meaning updating will likely mask backdating. A study where they go in the opposite direction is needed.

Unexpected Observations

  • Insert content here...

New Hypotheses

  • Insert content here...

Current Protocol

  • Insert content here...

Current Materials

  • Insert content here...

New Data

Participant 4

  • This person made weird judgments. Said there would be no change in price, due to supply and demand, both before and after being shown the prices.

Faults

  • Didn't understand the inflation note.
  • Didn't understand the inflation attention check.
  • The quality of explanation is still very low.

Corrections

  • Simplified both the inflation note and the inflation attention check.