User:Alexander L. Davis/Notebook/Backdating/2013/03/30

From OpenWetWare

< User:Alexander L. Davis | Notebook | Backdating | 2013 | 03(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Corrections)
Current revision (10:35, 31 March 2013) (view source)
(Faults)
 
Line 31: Line 31:
* Didn't understand the inflation note.
* Didn't understand the inflation note.
* Didn't understand the inflation attention check.
* Didn't understand the inflation attention check.
 +
* The quality of explanation is still very low.
==Corrections==
==Corrections==

Current revision

Project name Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

Entry title

  • Participant 4

Comments

  • The method does not seem strong enough to detect the backdating effect. Updating and backdating go in the same direction in this study, meaning updating will likely mask backdating. A study where they go in the opposite direction is needed.

Unexpected Observations

  • Insert content here...

New Hypotheses

  • Insert content here...

Current Protocol

  • Insert content here...

Current Materials

  • Insert content here...

New Data

Participant 4

  • This person made weird judgments. Said there would be no change in price, due to supply and demand, both before and after being shown the prices.

Faults

  • Didn't understand the inflation note.
  • Didn't understand the inflation attention check.
  • The quality of explanation is still very low.

Corrections

  • Simplified both the inflation note and the inflation attention check.


Personal tools