The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
 Project name
|
<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>
|
Entry title
Total results including pretests 1-7 and pilot test 1:
- Coal Price Predictions (~78% up):
- Up predictions: 18
- Down predictions: 3
- No Change (NC): 2
- Incorrect Inflation Answers: 5/23 (~25%)
- Bad Explanations: 12/23 (~50%)
- Mentions inflation: 4
- Just says supply and demand: 8
- Increased confidence after UP/NC predictions: 11/19
- Perfect confidence in explanation: 2/20
Unexpected Observations
New Hypotheses
Current Protocol
Current Materials
New Data
Participant 1
- Favorable to big text.
- Wanted information on desirable story length.
- Suggested changing story to explanation.
- Wanted it to be called "your story"
- Wanted warning on how important/needed estimates would be.
- Wanted uneditable boxes.
- Wanted real coal prices on top of page rather than bottom.
- Misunderstanding with prediction check.
Participant 2
- Suggested more difficult quality checking questions. Question One is definitely too easy.
- Suggested the second similarity question is unnecessary.
Faults
- Question checks too easy.
- Boxes should be uneditable.
Corrections
- Changed it to "your story"
- Provided information about story length.
- Made attention checks on a separate page. Made the last one more difficult.
|
Project name
