User:Alexander L. Davis/Notebook/In the Problem Pit/2013/03/14: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* They seemed to base their questions on what would concern them, confirming the self-projection theory. | * They seemed to base their questions on what would concern them, confirming the self-projection theory. | ||
* It is going to be important to draw the citizen science sample from the same population as those who are offered the program. If people use self-projection, then those projections will be most valid from the actual sample, rather than MTurk masters participants who may be idiosyncratic. | |||
==Unexpected Observations== | ==Unexpected Observations== |
Revision as of 09:53, 15 March 2013
Project name | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Entry titleFirst Pass CommentsThese are the first two pretests. I have a vague concern about the research, not knowing exactly what the focus or story is. I am considering xx. Created a qualification in MTurk for one participant to allow him to be in future problem pit studies. I need to create an acceptance sampling method to keep the number of pre-test participants bounded.
Unexpected Observations
New Hypotheses
Current Protocol
Current MaterialsNew Data
Participant 1
Participant 2
Faults
Corrections
|