User:Amirah: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 274: Line 274:
</td><td> 12
</td><td> 12
</td></tr></table>
</td></tr></table>
<br>
<br>
<br>


{| border="1"
{| border="1"

Revision as of 17:38, 30 April 2007

protein function / re-engineering ideas
I assembly : alter gene so that surface receptors are present on P1
so that it can determine the number of bacteria phages
being secreted at a time.
II replication of DNA + strand : encode so that P2 can be switched
on and off based on the environment which it's in,
example: stops replication when in a certian
concentration of Ca2+
III phage tail protein (5 copies): possible mechanism for selectivity
to only certain bacteria, dealing with P3 connectivity to the TolA
protein on bacterial pilus.
IV assembly : [look into how P3/P6 cap put on] re-engineer so that
multi-phage bacterial links are formed, which requires altering
the mechanism of how P4 interacts with the P3/P6 cap with which
the phage is secreted.
V binds ssDNA : alter interaction with P9/P7 so that a limited
number of ssDNA maybe surrounded by P8 at a time.
VI phage tail protein (5 copies): re-engineering closely linked with
that of Gene III. Alter it to assist with bacterial selectivity.
VII phage head protein (5 copies): alter gene so as to alter its confor-
mation. A change in conformation can expand the different residues
that can be attatched to its N-terminal portion.
VIII phage coat protein (2700 copies): alter genes so that the protein P8
has an affinity for certain residues or salts. This can vastly increase
the function of m13 as a whole. It can be used to transport different
things into bacteria.
IX phage head protein (5 copies): re-engineering closely linked to that
of Gene VII. However, since 9 is located on the surface of m13,
it can be altered so that it can express different reactive chains on
the phage surface.
X DNA replication : since altering Gene X is synonymous with altering
Gene II, I would leave it alone and concentrate more on changing
the functionality of gene 2. This makes more sense since Gene II as
a better defined function within m13.
XI assembly : functionality of 11 is closely linked to that of Gene 4
and Gene 1. Re-engineer so that it can assist with forming multi-
phage chains, or so that it can assist with controlling
replication.




Diagnostic digest 1 plasmid with insert plasmid no insert
Enzyme(s) used Zra1 Zra1
Buffer used NEBuffer 2
SEBuffer B
NEBuffer 2
SEBuffer B
Temperature 37 celsius 37 celsius
Predicted fragments 8708 bp none, circular DNA
Diagnostic digest 2 plasmid with insert plasmid no insert
Enzyme(s) used BamHI BamHI
Buffer used NEBuffer 2 NEBuffer 2
Temperature 37 celsius 37 celsius
Predicted fragments none, circular DNA 8669 bp




Alteration Method
Deleted Gene VII assembly : point mutation on codon within the RBS of gene VII while still
maintaining the same amino acid.
Added dual restriction enzyme buffer region Inserted BamHI and EagI restriction sites after the end of the Gene IX orf.
Moved Gene VIII promoter point mutation on codon within promoter region which is embedded in gene IX.
acutal promotor is shifted after the buffer region.
Moved Gene VIII RBS point mutation on the initial RBS located within Gene IX. Then shifted un-mutated
RBS after new promotor region.
Removal of overlap between
Gene IX and Gene VIII
Point mutation on start codon ATG to ATC which does not alter the amino acid.
Start codon for Gene VIII orf then shifted to after the new RBS.
Problematic Genes Reasoning
Gene X Gene X is completely located within Gene II, its RBC, promoter region and ORF.
I would hesistate to refactor this portion of the M13 genome because of the risk
of many complications. Moving Gene X would also cause the genome to grow a
considerable amount since it will have 2 copies of Gene X, its RBS, and promoter
(one active, one inactive). Also, going back to functionality. Both Gene II and Gene
X play a part in propagation of sDNA within the host cell, there functions must be
closely linked considering the complete overlap of Gene X in Gene II.

SAGA subunits, S. cerevisiae

Ada subunits size,chromosome,null p-type notes
Ada1 (aka HFI1, SUP110, SRM12, GAN1) 1.467 kb/489 aa, Chr. XVI,
viable
Ada2 (aka SWI8) 1.305 kb/434aa, Chr. IV,
viable
Ada3(aka NGG1, SWI7) 2.109 kb/702aa, Chr. IV,
viable
Gcn5 (aka ADA4, SWI9) 1.32 kb/439aa, Chr. VII,
viable
Ada5 (aka SPT20) 1.815 kb/604aa, Chr. XV,
viable
Spt subunits size, chromosome, null p-type notes
Spt3 1.014 kb/337aa, Chr. IV,
viable
Spt7(aka GIT2) 3.999 kb/1332aa, Chr. II,
viable
Spt8 1.809 kb/602aa, Chr. XII,
viable
Spt20 (aka Ada5) 1.815 kb/604aa, Chr. XV,
viable
TAF subunits size, chromosome, null p-type notes
TAF5 (aka TAF90) 2.397 kb/798aa, Chr. II, inviable
TAF6 (aka TAF60) 1.551 kb/516aa, Chr. VII, inviable
TAF9 (aka TAF17) 0.474 kb/157aa, Chr. XIII, inviable
TAF10 (aka TAF23, TAF25) 0.621 kb/206aa, Chr. IV, inviable
TAF12(aka TAF61, TAF68) 1.620 kb/539aa, Chr. IV, inviable
Tra1 subunit size, chromosome, null p-type notes
Tra1 11.235 kb/3744aa, Chr. VIII, inviable
other subunits size, chromosome, null p-type notes
Sgf73 1.974 kb/657aa, Chr. VII ,
viable
Sgf29 0.779 kb/259aa, Chr. III,
viable
Sgf11 0.3 kb/99aa, Chr.XVI,
viable
Ubp8 1.416 kb/471aa, Chr. XIII,
viable
Forward Primer: TACTTGAAACCCTGCTTTTTTTATTTGTTATTAATAATTatgtcgaaagctacatataa

Reverse Primer: ttacttttgctggccgcaTCTTTTTGTTTTATTATTATTGTTGAATGCTATTTGCTGAA

Sus1 gene with intron, Chr. II,
viable
Transformation Factor FY2068 colonies/plate
PRS416 330
no Temp PCR 0
+ Temp PCR 12




Surface display of scFv fusion? Binding to gold?
Glucose Galactose Glucose Galactose
pCT-CON
pAu1