User:Cameron Neylon/BioSysBioabstract: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Open Science: Why? How? And where to next? A BioSys Bio Workshop Few people would argue that more openness in the way we practice Science would help to make our research more effective, m...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Open Science: Why? How? And where to next?
Science in the Open: Why? How? And where to next?
A BioSys Bio Workshop
A BioSys Bio Workshop



Revision as of 12:22, 31 March 2008

Science in the Open: Why? How? And where to next? A BioSys Bio Workshop

Few people would argue that more openness in the way we practice Science would help to make our research more effective, more efficient, and more available to the community that funds it. There is a growing interest in some sectors of the academic research community in adopting more 'open' approaches to research practice. These range from publishing in the open access literature, through research discussions on message boards to discussing the details of their research on blogs. But what does it mean to be open? Is it merely enough to share your results on-line, to blog about your thoughts and experiments? Or does the idea of openness need to be taken further?

While the application of Open Science approaches remains limited in academic research they nonetheless raise serious questions about the future of both the traditional format of research publication and of peer review in its current form. Responses to the advocacy of 'Open Science' therefore, understandably, run the gamut from fanatical support, through amused tolerance, to derision and, in some cases, extreme hostility. In this workshop we will discuss the state and future prospects of Open Science and the tools that will need to be developed to take the open agenda forward. We will discuss the boundaries beyond which openness should, perhaps, not pass community more generally. As part of the workshop we will aim to outline the principles of an ‘Open Science Protocol’ that will be made available for community discussion to describe the principles and conditions under which we can agree to carry forward the development of Open Science.

The logical extreme of these approaches is to make the researcher's laboratory notebook freely available online or even to carry out the preparation of a research grant in public. This approach, described as ‘Open Notebook Science’ has only been adopted by a small number of groups so far but the impact of these efforts is growing. This workshop will discuss the technical advances that make Open Science possible, including the development of web based social authoring and networking tools such as Blogs, Wikis, Lifestreams, and social bookmarking sites. In an introductory talk Cameron Neylon will discuss the experience of adopting Open Science practices in his own research group, the state and usefulness of tools available to support these approaches, with a focus on the tools being developed within his group, in collaboration with the Frey group at the University of Southampton, to support Open Notebook Science.

Julius Lucks will then describe the state and progress of one of the main resources supporting open science practice, OpenWetWare (openwetware.org). ###Julius do you want to add some detail here or shall I just make it up####

To spark the discussion that will follow on from the talks, John Cumber, the new OpenWetWare Steering Committee coordinator will present a draft ‘Protocol for Open Science’ which will form the basis of a discussion for the remainder of the workshop. Our aim will be to within the session agree the issues that such a protocol should cover and to make some start towards identifying possible standards and responsibilities for those who with to carry forward the agenda of Open Science.