User:Daniel Mietchen/Notebook/Open Science/2010/07/26: Difference between revisions
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | <!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | ||
== Wikis can act as publication filters for new research == | == Wikis can act as publication filters for new research == | ||
* The following is a comment on [http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com/2010/07/do-we-still-need-pre-publication-peer.html Do we still need pre-publication peer-review ?] by [http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com/ Pedro Beltrão]: | * The following is a [http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com/2010/07/do-we-still-need-pre-publication-peer.html?showComment=1280103802620#c2295787331475224786 comment] on [http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com/2010/07/do-we-still-need-pre-publication-peer.html Do we still need pre-publication peer-review ?] by [http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com/ Pedro Beltrão]: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
I fully agree that we have a problem here, but don't think we're that far off a workable solution: technically, [[wiki]]s can do the filtering already today — it is just that culturally (being so accustomed to the [[scholarly journal|journal]] article as ''the'' container of new [[scientific research|research]]), we are not ready for this yet. <br/> <br/> | I fully agree that we have a problem here, but don't think we're that far off a workable solution: technically, [[wiki]]s can do the filtering already today — it is just that culturally (being so accustomed to the [[scholarly journal|journal]] article as ''the'' container of new [[scientific research|research]]), we are not ready for this yet. <br/> <br/> | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
The idea of posting the news on talk pages serves the purpose of limiting self-promotion within the framework of current wikis, but if the wiki had a [[karma (software|karma]] system (ideally at both [[article-level metrics|article]] and [[scientometrics|systemic]] and possibly intermediate levels), researchers could update the relevant articles themselves, giving them the chance to increase their karma at the risk of karma losses if either the content or its presentation are judged non-appropriate by the relevant articles' communities. | The idea of posting the news on talk pages serves the purpose of limiting self-promotion within the framework of current wikis, but if the wiki had a [[karma (software|karma]] system (ideally at both [[article-level metrics|article]] and [[scientometrics|systemic]] and possibly intermediate levels), researchers could update the relevant articles themselves, giving them the chance to increase their karma at the risk of karma losses if either the content or its presentation are judged non-appropriate by the relevant articles' communities. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Note added after posting of the comment: An example where an approach very close to the one described above can already be observed in practice is provided by the [http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/ Polymath project]: The edit histories of its Problems [http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=Finding_primes&limit=500&action=history 4] and [http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=The_Erd%C5%91s_discrepancy_problem&limit=500&action=history 5] reflect how knowledge on the topic has advanced in the course of the investigation. | |||
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | <!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> |
Revision as of 17:47, 25 July 2010
What would science look like if it were open? | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Wikis can act as publication filters for new research
Note added after posting of the comment: An example where an approach very close to the one described above can already be observed in practice is provided by the Polymath project: The edit histories of its Problems 4 and 5 reflect how knowledge on the topic has advanced in the course of the investigation. |