User:Daniel Mietchen/Notebook/Open Science/2012/03/31: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 13: Line 13:


== Bottom  part ==
== Bottom  part ==
''This section is just here so that I can work in the section above without bothering with the formatting below.''
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
|}
|}


__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

Revision as of 16:27, 31 March 2012

What would science look like if it were open? <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

My plans for SciFund 2

The deadline for signing up to the second round of the SciFund challenge is 11:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time, USA), Saturday March 31, 2012, so in a few hours from now. I will draft my 150-word abstract here prior to submission.

Abstract

Fossils are rare, and fossils with pathological alterations even more so. For this reason, studies of pathological fossils stand to benefit disproportionately more from non-invasive means of investigation than do studies of more commonly available forms. Part of my PhD research was devoted to the application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to fossils, both normal and pathologically altered ones.

Bottom part

This section is just here so that I can work in the section above without bothering with the formatting below.