User:Etienne Robillard/Notebook/NK603

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Bioremediation or eugenic science ?)
(Bioremediation or eugenic science ?)
Line 3: Line 3:
* I often see this word at a numerous places but rarely a sound explanation to the inherent motivation of adopting bioremediation for synthetic biology, a subset of genetic engineering using live organisms as the media for creating new and artificial life forms.
* I often see this word at a numerous places but rarely a sound explanation to the inherent motivation of adopting bioremediation for synthetic biology, a subset of genetic engineering using live organisms as the media for creating new and artificial life forms.
-
* Back in World-War 2, were the germans developing the eugenic science or were they "experimenting" new bioremediation techniques with organophosphate gases? Is thus bioremediation a singular aspect of eugenics, especially for devices developed for the E.coli K-12 strain, a prokariote organism ?
+
* Back in World-War 2, were the germans developing the eugenic science or were they "experimenting" new bioremediation techniques with organophosphate gases?  
 +
** Is thus bioremediation a singular aspect of eugenics, especially for devices developed for the E.coli K-12 strain, a prokariote organism ?
* What are the real objectives of Synthetic biology beyond inducing cancerous cells prematurely to mouses fed with genetically-modified corn ?   
* What are the real objectives of Synthetic biology beyond inducing cancerous cells prematurely to mouses fed with genetically-modified corn ?   

Revision as of 19:58, 26 September 2012

Bioremediation or eugenic science ?

  • I often see this word at a numerous places but rarely a sound explanation to the inherent motivation of adopting bioremediation for synthetic biology, a subset of genetic engineering using live organisms as the media for creating new and artificial life forms.
  • Back in World-War 2, were the germans developing the eugenic science or were they "experimenting" new bioremediation techniques with organophosphate gases?
    • Is thus bioremediation a singular aspect of eugenics, especially for devices developed for the E.coli K-12 strain, a prokariote organism ?
  • What are the real objectives of Synthetic biology beyond inducing cancerous cells prematurely to mouses fed with genetically-modified corn ?
  • Is cancer detection over cancer prevention the culprit and main concern of Synthia design ?
  • Is not human based experimentation strictly forbidden by some public authority ?
    • If so, is not bioremediation a futile term to hiden eugenics into a philantropist hat?
  • Or is the people not the only authority which should encompass and lead scientific research from the hands of the governments and corporations?
  • Would the germans have approved bioremediation, assuming they knew Hitler was preparing a large-scale genocide ?
  • Why did the mouses developed severe mutations over a long-term period as they were fed corn grown for mass-consumption ?
    • Were the scientists who developed the strain of GE corn (NK603) knowledgable or were the mutations caused from mistakes in the protocol ?

Feel free to add your comments here or using the talk page!

References

"We make our world significant by the courage of our questions, and by the depth of our answers." ~Carl Sagan

Personal tools