User:Paul Rothenberg/Notebook/Pauls Notebook/2012/10/10

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 12:53, 10 October 2012

Project name

1. UV-Vis spectrum was calibrated with DMF. System checks were performed, and a baseline was run from 800-200 nm.
2. DMF was used as a baseline, and run from 800-200 nm. The file was saved as a .spc file and a .txt file to dropbox
3. DMF was then run under Fluorescence, and the file was saved to dropbox
4. The 4μM NiPPIX was run under UV-VIS and Fluorescence
5. The 2μM NIPPIX was run under UV-VIS and Fluorescence
6. The 0.5μM NiPPIX was run under UV-VIS and Fluorescence

Fluorescence revealed two peaks in the NiPPIX, at approximately 590 nm and 640 nm, indicating that there is a presence of porphyrin with no nickel and nickel porphyrin. The synthesis needs to be reperformed until the second peak is not present under fluorescence.

Revision as of 12:53, 10 October 2012 (view source) Paul Rothenberg (Talk \| contribs) (→10 October 2012) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 12:53, 10 October 2012 (view source) Paul Rothenberg (Talk \| contribs) (→10 October 2012) Next diff →
Line 16:		Line 16:
	*Fluorescence revealed two peaks in the NiPPIX, at approximately 590 nm and 640 nm, indicating that there is a presence of porphyrin with no nickel and nickel porphyrin. The synthesis needs to be reperformed until the second peak is not present under fluorescence.		*Fluorescence revealed two peaks in the NiPPIX, at approximately 590 nm and 640 nm, indicating that there is a presence of porphyrin with no nickel and nickel porphyrin. The synthesis needs to be reperformed until the second peak is not present under fluorescence.

-	[Image:Absorbance of UV-Vis Graph.JPG]	+	[[Image:Absorbance of UV-Vis Graph.JPG]]