User:Pranav Rathi/Notebook/OT/2010/04/13: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Pranav Rathi (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Results=== | ===Results=== | ||
Just by looking the pictures, it is clear; what happens to the beam at higher powers and up-to what power the beam stays in the fundamental mode. | Just by looking the pictures, it is clear; what happens to the beam at higher powers and up-to what power the beam stays in the fundamental mode. | ||
http://www.evernote.com/pub/pranavrathi1/beamprofileapr132010 | http://www.evernote.com/pub/pranavrathi1/beamprofileapr132010 | ||
:[[User:Steven J. Koch|Steve Koch]] 01:11, 14 April 2010 (EDT): To me looks like between 1.7 and 2 Watts is when it gets bad? | |||
===Conclusion=== | ===Conclusion=== | ||
Revision as of 22:11, 13 April 2010
 Project name
|
<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Power Step-Up Beam Profile experiment (BPE)Due to bad alignment of the tweezer I was not able to do the “Sum Signal Experiment”. But I finished the BPE. I will discuss it in detail here. But for now the results are presented. MotivationSet-UpProcedureResultsJust by looking the pictures, it is clear; what happens to the beam at higher powers and up-to what power the beam stays in the fundamental mode. http://www.evernote.com/pub/pranavrathi1/beamprofileapr132010
Conclusion |
|
