User:Sean P Corum/Notebook/PHIX174 Cell Free/2012/09/25: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Sean P Corum (talk | contribs) |
Sean P Corum (talk | contribs) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | <!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | ||
===Hypothesis 2: Gene L is necessary for phage propagation.=== | |||
* Unfortunately, I hosed the 1.25 μM sample (from Monday). | |||
* Gel electrophoresis showed the following over the rest of the primer 4 mix range: | |||
** 2.5 μM: a weak band at ~≥ 5 kb (amplified ΦX174 genome), and two stonger bands at ~100 bp and >100 bp | |||
** 5 μM: two strong bands at ~100 bp and >100 bp | |||
** 10 μM: two stong bands at ~100 bp and >100 bp | |||
* Given these results, here's what I think is happening. At too high primer concentration, the ssDNA primers, being complementary strands of WP-PCR, do not unbind, inhibiting PCR. | |||
* I will do one more test over a primer 4 mix of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 μM. | |||
* Aliquot 6 × 4.5 μL ΦX174 WP-PCR mix (1X reaction buffer, .25 mM dNTPs mix, PfuUltra I DNAP, ~0.1 nM ΦX174 template) | |||
*# 0.5 μL 5 water | |||
*# 0.5 μL 5 μM primer 4 mix | |||
*# 0.5 μL 10 μM primer 4 mix | |||
*# 0.5 μL 20 μM primer 4 mix | |||
*# 0.5 μL 40 μM primer 4 mix | |||
*# 0.5 μL 80 μM primer 4 mix | |||
* WP-PCR Cycling parameters: | |||
*# 95 °C 2 m | |||
*# 95 °C 30 s | |||
*# 58° C 30 s | |||
*# 72 °C 15 m | |||
*# Repeat 2-4 an additional 29 times for 30 total cycles | |||
*# 72 °C 30 m | |||
===Characterization B-C: Expression of PHIX174 promoters/UTRs fused to PX-UTR1-deGFP and PX-UTRX-deGFP.=== | ===Characterization B-C: Expression of PHIX174 promoters/UTRs fused to PX-UTR1-deGFP and PX-UTRX-deGFP.=== | ||
Line 33: | Line 61: | ||
*# Read: 625/655 nM @ gain = 225 w/ settings | *# Read: 625/655 nM @ gain = 225 w/ settings | ||
*# Loop: 2-5 every 3 m for 12 h | *# Loop: 2-5 every 3 m for 12 h | ||
** settings = | ** settings = high lamp energy, endpoint, bottom reading, other settings default | ||
* Transcription maximized around 1 hr after the experiment began. I fine-tuned the measurements, zeroing in on the range of gain = 210-212 as the maximum possible gain where counts < 80,000. I found that the 10 nM plasmid sample broke that threshold at gain = 212, but didn't at gain = 211. | |||
* Therefore, gain = 211 is the maximum possible gain, achieving the best possible fluorescence sensitivity, without breaking the 80,000 count threshold at 10 nM plasmid. | |||
* I then redid the experiment, with the following changes to the plate reader program: | |||
*# 29 °C | |||
*# Shake: fast double orbital 30s | |||
*# Read MGapt: 625/655 nM @ gain = 211 w/ settings | |||
*# Read deGFP: 485/528 nM @ gain = 61 w/ settings | |||
*# Shake: fast double orbital 30s | |||
*# Loop: 2-4 every 3 m for 12 h | |||
** settings = high lamp energy, endpoint, bottom reading, other settings default | |||
* The goal was to measure transcript levels of MGapt and translated deGFP simultaneously. |
Revision as of 13:24, 27 September 2012
PHIX174 Cell Free Expression | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Hypothesis 2: Gene L is necessary for phage propagation.
Characterization B-C: Expression of PHIX174 promoters/UTRs fused to PX-UTR1-deGFP and PX-UTRX-deGFP.
|