User:Steven J. Koch/Notebook/Kochlab/2010/09/04/Curr Bio (2009) Muthukrishnan, Hancock et al kinesin-2 processivity: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Citation== | ==Citation== | ||
Muthukrishnan, G., Zhang, Y., Shastry, S., & Hancock, W. O. (2009). The processivity of kinesin-2 motors suggests diminished front-head gating. Current biology : CB, 19(5), 442-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.058. | Muthukrishnan, G., Zhang, Y., Shastry, S., & Hancock, W. O. (2009). The processivity of kinesin-2 motors suggests diminished front-head gating. Current biology : CB, 19(5), 442-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.058. | ||
==Other links== | |||
* Mendeley: | |||
* Follow-on paper: | |||
** Shastry, S., & Hancock, W. O. (2010). Neck linker length determines the degree of processivity in kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 motors. Current biology : CB, 20(10), 939-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.065. | |||
==Notes== | |||
They use kinesin-1, kinesin-2, kinesin-2 homodimeric structures, and stochastic simulation of discrete state models to investigate the role of neck linker tension in processivity. | |||
* kinesin-2 is 4x less processive than kinesin-1 (in the assay conditions they use) | |||
* neck linker lengths are 14 aa for k-1 and 17 aa for k-2. In undocked / undocked configuration, they use WLC to model the forces as 43 pN for kinesin-1 and 18 pN for kinesin-2 (assuming 8.1 nm between neck linker attachment sites) | |||
** as far as I can see, no discussion of docking | |||
** WLC parameters are 0.5 nm persistence length, 0.38 nm/aa contour length; not extensible (infiinite stretch modulus) | |||
* inserting three amino acids into kinesin-1 neck linker reduces the processivity. | |||
* stochastic model for kinesin-1 is able to replicate run length and time seen experimentally, with some tweaking. | |||
** they combine the rear-head detachment step with the Pi release step for a combined rate constant of 250/s, which they label as "empirical." In our model, we had to increase the Pi release to 200 to 300/s as well. This remains a puzzle compared to published values for Pi release. | |||
* stochastic model they use for kinesin-1 is to simple to account for the behavior of kinesin-2. Namely, that kinesin-2 processivity decreases with increasing ATP concentration. They expand the model to allow for front-head ATP binding when back head is in ADP-P state. Doing this and tweaking rate constants, they are able to fit the observed behavior with stochastic simulations. | |||
Revision as of 13:30, 4 September 2010
Citation
Muthukrishnan, G., Zhang, Y., Shastry, S., & Hancock, W. O. (2009). The processivity of kinesin-2 motors suggests diminished front-head gating. Current biology : CB, 19(5), 442-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.058.
Other links
- Mendeley:
- Follow-on paper:
- Shastry, S., & Hancock, W. O. (2010). Neck linker length determines the degree of processivity in kinesin-1 and kinesin-2 motors. Current biology : CB, 20(10), 939-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.065.
Notes
They use kinesin-1, kinesin-2, kinesin-2 homodimeric structures, and stochastic simulation of discrete state models to investigate the role of neck linker tension in processivity.
- kinesin-2 is 4x less processive than kinesin-1 (in the assay conditions they use)
- neck linker lengths are 14 aa for k-1 and 17 aa for k-2. In undocked / undocked configuration, they use WLC to model the forces as 43 pN for kinesin-1 and 18 pN for kinesin-2 (assuming 8.1 nm between neck linker attachment sites)
- as far as I can see, no discussion of docking
- WLC parameters are 0.5 nm persistence length, 0.38 nm/aa contour length; not extensible (infiinite stretch modulus)
- inserting three amino acids into kinesin-1 neck linker reduces the processivity.
- stochastic model for kinesin-1 is able to replicate run length and time seen experimentally, with some tweaking.
- they combine the rear-head detachment step with the Pi release step for a combined rate constant of 250/s, which they label as "empirical." In our model, we had to increase the Pi release to 200 to 300/s as well. This remains a puzzle compared to published values for Pi release.
- stochastic model they use for kinesin-1 is to simple to account for the behavior of kinesin-2. Namely, that kinesin-2 processivity decreases with increasing ATP concentration. They expand the model to allow for front-head ATP binding when back head is in ADP-P state. Doing this and tweaking rate constants, they are able to fit the observed behavior with stochastic simulations.
