User:Victor Tapia: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 2: Line 2:


==Contact Info==
==Contact Info==
[[Image:victor_tapia.jpg|thumb|right|'''Victor Tapia''']]
[[Image:victor_tapia.jpg|thumb|right|'''Victor Tapia''' I am looking for a more happy foto]]


*Victor Tapia
*Victor Tapia

Revision as of 12:35, 28 February 2009

I am a new member of OpenWetWare!

Contact Info

Victor Tapia I am looking for a more happy foto

I work in the Inst. f. Med. Immunol. at the Charité Medical School of Berlin in the research group of Dr. R. Volkmer [1,2].

Education

  • 2009?, PhD, Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité Medical School, Berlin
  • 2004, MS, Institute of Biology, Humboldt University, Berlin
  • 2002, BS, Institute of Biology, Humboldt University, Berlin

Research interests

  1. Modularity of Protein Structure and Cellular Signal Transduction.
  2. Protein Folding and Neurodegenerative Deseases.
  3. Natural Autoimmunology and Diagnostic Assays

for text on these topics, please follow this LINK

Publications

  1. Tapia & Volkmer (2009) "Exploring and profiling protein function with peptide arrays" in: Methods in molecular biology (eds. Chiari). Humana Press

    [book_chapter]

    This work reviews the peptide array technology focusing on technological advancements, oriented immobilization of peptide probes, and some interesting applications. Going along the philosophy of the monography series, we give some general recomendations on methods and instruments.

  2. Tapia V, Ay B, Triebus J, Wolter E, Boisguerin P, and Volkmer R. Evaluating the coupling efficiency of phosphorylated amino acids for SPOT synthesis. J Pept Sci. 2008 Dec;14(12):1309-14. DOI:10.1002/psc.1068 | PubMed ID:18816512 | HubMed [Paper3]

    This work was carried out to adapt "building block" approaches for the generation of phosphopeptides through resine-supported solid-phase peptide synthesis to the spot-technology, which relies on cellulose as support. It compares different coupling strategies for the incorporation of protected phoshoaminiacids into determined positions of synthetic peptides. We find that the use of EEDQ (caution!, neurotoxic) as coupling activator is the most efficient strategy in our comparison.

  3. Tapia V, Bongartz J, Schutkowski M, Bruni N, Weiser A, Ay B, Volkmer R, and Or-Guil M. Affinity profiling using the peptide microarray technology: a case study. Anal Biochem. 2007 Apr 1;363(1):108-18. DOI:10.1016/j.ab.2006.12.043 | PubMed ID:17288979 | HubMed [Paper2]

    This work analyses the predictive potential of microarray-based binding assays. Fluorescent SI-measurements were used to fit a mass-action derived model estimating the observed affinity (equil. diss. const.).

  4. Weiser AA, Or-Guil M, Tapia V, Leichsenring A, Schuchhardt J, Frömmel C, and Volkmer-Engert R. SPOT synthesis: reliability of array-based measurement of peptide binding affinity. Anal Biochem. 2005 Jul 15;342(2):300-11. DOI:10.1016/j.ab.2005.04.033 | PubMed ID:15950918 | HubMed [Paper1]

    This work analyses the quantitative potential of measurements derived from peptide macroarray-based immunobinding assays. Chemoluminiscent signal intensity data was confronted with independent "golden stardard" measurements (surface plasmon resonance-based binding assays on a BIAcoreX maschine).

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed

Useful links

  1. http://openwetware.org/wiki/Molecular_Recognition_Laboratorium
  2. http://openwetware.org/wiki/Template:Molecular_Recognition
  3. http://openwetware.org/wiki/User:Victor_Tapia/Notebook/pqbp1
  4. http://immunologie.charite.de/arbeitsgruppen/ag-volkmer/