User talk:Pranav Rathi/Notebook/OT/2010/09/29/CrystaLaser Vs CompassLaser: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ~~~~: I don't know for sure and without looking some more. It looks like perhaps the Crystalaser has an elliptical beam? Have you seen other evidence of that? If it is trapping better, ...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Steven J. Koch|Steve Koch]] 00:13, 4 October 2010 (EDT): I don't know for sure and without looking some more. It looks like perhaps the Crystalaser has an elliptical beam? Have you seen other evidence of that? If it is trapping better, that is great news. If we get good stiffness and stuck bead curves, then it doesn't matter much. Will talk with you this week. | [[User:Steven J. Koch|Steve Koch]] 00:13, 4 October 2010 (EDT): I don't know for sure and without looking some more. It looks like perhaps the Crystalaser has an elliptical beam? Have you seen other evidence of that? If it is trapping better, that is great news. If we get good stiffness and stuck bead curves, then it doesn't matter much. Will talk with you this week. | ||
:[[User:Steven J. Koch|Steve Koch]] 22:13, 4 October 2010 (EDT): So with the new information, it looks like the Crystalaser is good, right, especially considering it is trapping well? | |||
Latest revision as of 19:13, 4 October 2010
Steve Koch 00:13, 4 October 2010 (EDT): I don't know for sure and without looking some more. It looks like perhaps the Crystalaser has an elliptical beam? Have you seen other evidence of that? If it is trapping better, that is great news. If we get good stiffness and stuck bead curves, then it doesn't matter much. Will talk with you this week.
- Steve Koch 22:13, 4 October 2010 (EDT): So with the new information, it looks like the Crystalaser is good, right, especially considering it is trapping well?
