Work Area: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 80: Line 80:


===2006===
===2006===
Heavy metals
<biblio>
#Haleem06 pmid=12324353
</biblio>


===2007===
===2007===

Revision as of 20:05, 8 July 2007

Papers to cite

biosensors

  1. Daunert S, Barrett G, Feliciano JS, Shetty RS, Shrestha S, and Smith-Spencer W. Genetically engineered whole-cell sensing systems: coupling biological recognition with reporter genes. Chem Rev. 2000 Jul 12;100(7):2705-38. DOI:10.1021/cr990115p | PubMed ID:11749302 | HubMed [ChemRev2000]
  2. Yagi K. Applications of whole-cell bacterial sensors in biotechnology and environmental science. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Jan;73(6):1251-8. DOI:10.1007/s00253-006-0718-6 | PubMed ID:17111136 | HubMed [Yagi2007]
  3. Harms H, Wells MC, and van der Meer JR. Whole-cell living biosensors--are they ready for environmental application?. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006 Apr;70(3):273-80. DOI:10.1007/s00253-006-0319-4 | PubMed ID:16463172 | HubMed [Harms06]
  4. Gu MB, Min J, and Kim EJ. Toxicity monitoring and classification of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) using recombinant bioluminescent bacteria. Chemosphere. 2002 Jan;46(2):289-94. DOI:10.1016/s0045-6535(01)00081-9 | PubMed ID:11827287 | HubMed [Gu02]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed

Papers cited by Forrest's writings

  1. Huh WK, Falvo JV, Gerke LC, Carroll AS, Howson RW, Weissman JS, and O'Shea EK. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):686-91. DOI:10.1038/nature02026 | PubMed ID:14562095 | HubMed [nature425]
  2. Pajot-Augy E, Crowe M, Levasseur G, Salesse R, and Connerton I. Engineered yeasts as reporter systems for odorant detection. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2003;23(2-3):155-71. DOI:10.1081/rrs-120025196 | PubMed ID:14626444 | HubMed [Pajot-Augy03]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed

Papers baby wants

  1. Lu TK and Collins JJ. Dispersing biofilms with engineered enzymatic bacteriophage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 3;104(27):11197-202. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0704624104 | PubMed ID:17592147 | HubMed [lu07]

Used in paper already

  1. Keane A, Phoenix P, Ghoshal S, and Lau PC. Exposing culprit organic pollutants: a review. J Microbiol Methods. 2002 Apr;49(2):103-19. DOI:10.1016/s0167-7012(01)00382-7 | PubMed ID:11830297 | HubMed [keane]

Bacterial plastics

  1. Ward PG, Goff M, Donner M, Kaminsky W, and O'Connor KE. A two step chemo-biotechnological conversion of polystyrene to a biodegradable thermoplastic. Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Apr 1;40(7):2433-7. DOI:10.1021/es0517668 | PubMed ID:16649270 | HubMed [ward]
  2. Liu SJ and Steinbüchel A. A novel genetically engineered pathway for synthesis of poly(hydroxyalkanoic acids) in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Feb;66(2):739-43. DOI:10.1128/AEM.66.2.739-743.2000 | PubMed ID:10653745 | HubMed [liu2000]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed

Chronology of biosensors

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)

  1. Gu MB, Min J, and Kim EJ. Toxicity monitoring and classification of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) using recombinant bioluminescent bacteria. Chemosphere. 2002 Jan;46(2):289-94. DOI:10.1016/s0045-6535(01)00081-9 | PubMed ID:11827287 | HubMed [Gu02]

Herbicides

  1. Shao CY, Howe CJ, Porter AJ, and Glover LA. Novel cyanobacterial biosensor for detection of herbicides. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Oct;68(10):5026-33. DOI:10.1128/AEM.68.10.5026-5033.2002 | PubMed ID:12324353 | HubMed [Shao02]

2003

2004

2005

2006

Heavy metals

  1. Shao CY, Howe CJ, Porter AJ, and Glover LA. Novel cyanobacterial biosensor for detection of herbicides. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Oct;68(10):5026-33. DOI:10.1128/AEM.68.10.5026-5033.2002 | PubMed ID:12324353 | HubMed [Haleem06]

2007

Figures


Example of Abstraction Hierarchy. The oscillator system is composed of three inverter devices, each of which is composed of a ribosome binding site part, a protein coding part, terminator parts, and a regulatory part. DNA-level researchers need only be concerned with creating a specific DNA sequence; part-level researchers need only be concerned with designing DNA sequences with a certain functionality; device-level researchers need only be concerned with combining existing parts to achieve a certain input-output response; and system-level researchers need only be concerned with combining existing devices to build a system with certain behaviors.

Text

How 'Synthetic' is Environmental Synthetic Biology?

The current state of knowledge in biology has enabled researchers to work principally within one level of the abstraction hierarchy to engineer novel organisms. For example, a biological input-output device can be created by taking an output part from one organism (e.g. the GFP gene from jellyfish [Nature425]), and input part from another (e.g. an olfactory receptor from a mammalian cell [Pajot-Augy03]), and integrating those parts into a chassis of choice (e.g. yeast cells). This sort of genetic plug-and-play can in some cases be done without fully understanding the operational mechanisms of all the parts.

However, the lack of standardization of biological parts and devices has impeded research progress by requiring researchers to devote a significant portion of their efforts to interface engineering -- that is, assembling the many parts and getting them to function together predictably. Standardization would reduce costly inefficiencies by simplifying both the design and construction stages of bioengineering and minimizing the amount of experimental guesswork needed.

Furthermore, as bioconstruction technologies advance, synthetic biology research activities can be expected to progress at higher rates and become much more widespread. While researchers today can purchase made-to-order DNA cheaply, most of the necessary bioengineering steps (e.g. cell miniprep, gel electrophoresis, growing cultures) must still be done laboriously by hand. Decoupling design and construction in bioengineering would allow individuals to innovate without having to work in expensive wet lab facilities at all times. Just as online machine shop services have enabled individuals to order custom-designed parts to create innovative products from their home, the further decoupling of biological design and construction will allow synthetic biologist to create useful biological systems at lower costs. Perhaps more importantly, the decoupling would enable a greater number of individuals (of various levels of experience) to utilize synthetic biology for solving a variety of real world problems.

In the following sections, the current state of environmental synthetic biology is summarized. It shall be apparent that most of the work involve creating whole cell sensors that contain a reporter (e.g. coding for GFP or luciferase) and a promoter inducible by environmental toxins. These projects can be considered device-level engineering, as the resulting product is usually a simple input-output device. System-level engineering for environmental applications is almost nonexistent.