Zachary T. Goldstein Week 4: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Results: format link) |
(→Methods: Part 1) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=Methods= | =Methods= | ||
*Uploaded the “visit_1_S1_S9.txt” and “visit_1_S10_S15.txt” files into the nucleic | |||
acid tool set of the Biology Workbench by saving to ThawSpace | |||
*Two data files were used because the Biology Workbench only allows up to 64 | |||
sequences to be uploaded at a time | |||
*Generated a multiple sequence alignment and distance tree for 12 of these sequences (See Table 1) | |||
*Unrooted tree was created using Biology Workbench | |||
**Selected sequences | |||
**Selected "CLUSTALW" and then "Submit" | |||
*The clones from each subject clustered together (Figure 1) however subject 15's sequences were more spread out than others | |||
*Some subjects’ clones show more diversity than others. This is observable by tracing the length of lines connecting the sequences from the same subject (ex: S15 and S1) (Figure 1) | |||
* None of the subjects really clustered together however it is difficult to differentiate the lengths of the terminal branches due to the lack of a definitive evolutionary beginning | |||
*Observations of the tree: | |||
** | |||
** | |||
** | |||
*The Unrooted Tree was saved and uploaded to this assignment (right) | |||
=Results= | =Results= |
Revision as of 15:38, 20 September 2016
Purpose
Methods
- Uploaded the “visit_1_S1_S9.txt” and “visit_1_S10_S15.txt” files into the nucleic
acid tool set of the Biology Workbench by saving to ThawSpace
- Two data files were used because the Biology Workbench only allows up to 64
sequences to be uploaded at a time
- Generated a multiple sequence alignment and distance tree for 12 of these sequences (See Table 1)
- Unrooted tree was created using Biology Workbench
- Selected sequences
- Selected "CLUSTALW" and then "Submit"
- The clones from each subject clustered together (Figure 1) however subject 15's sequences were more spread out than others
- Some subjects’ clones show more diversity than others. This is observable by tracing the length of lines connecting the sequences from the same subject (ex: S15 and S1) (Figure 1)
- None of the subjects really clustered together however it is difficult to differentiate the lengths of the terminal branches due to the lack of a definitive evolutionary beginning
- Observations of the tree:
- The Unrooted Tree was saved and uploaded to this assignment (right)
Results
Conclusion
Acknowledgments
- I received help on this assignment from User:Shivum A Desai
- While I received help on this page everything completed for this assignment was done by me and was not copied from anyone else
References
Category: BIOL368/F16:People BIOL368/F16
All class assignments:
- Week 1 Assignment
- Week 2 Assignment
- Week 3 Assignment
- Week 4 Assignment
- Week 5 Assignment
- Week 6 Assignment
- Week 7 Assignment
- Week 8 Assignment
- Week 9 Assignment
- Week 10 Assignment
- Week 11 Assignment
- Week 14 Assignment
- Week 15 Assignment
All individual assignments:
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 2
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 3
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 4
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 5
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 6
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 7
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 8
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 9
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 10
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 11
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 14
- Zachary T. Goldstein Week 15
All shared journals:
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 1
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 2
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 3
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 4
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 5
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 6
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 7
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 8
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 9
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 10
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 11
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 14
- BIOL368/F16:Class Journal Week 15