BME100 f2016:Group16 W8AM L5

From OpenWetWare

Jump to: navigation, search
BME 100 Fall 2016 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help
Image:BME494_Asu_logo.png

Contents

OUR TEAM

Name: Nandini Sharma
Name: Nandini Sharma
Name: Christian Forbus
Name: Christian Forbus
Name: Jared Macanas
Name: Jared Macanas
Name: TJ Smith
Name: TJ Smith
Name: Brandon Gandolf
Name: Brandon Gandolf


LAB 5 WRITE-UP

PCR Reaction Report

For Part C of the lab, our group prepped our samples for the Polymerase Chain Reaction. To complete this we needed to know proper lab procedure such as how to pipette and label. The pre-lab was helpful in informing us of the steps in the process of pipetting. The first step was to label the tubes. We were able to maintain the labeling structure that we established in the initial parts of this lab. Once we had the pipette it was easy to fell the difference between the first and second stop. It takes more force to get to the second stop than it does to get to the first stop. While pipetting, it was difficult to ensure that all the liquid was all collected. It took a few tries on the first few tubes to ensure all the liquid was empties. By the end we were able to ensure that majority of the 50 microliters of the PCR mix and each sample were pipetted into the tubes. The overall process was tedious because of the amount of time it took but it was fairly simple and easy to understand.

Fluorimeter Procedure

Imaging set-up
When setting up our device to capture the images, we placed the phone, which in this case was an iPhone 7, in an upright position focused on the drop. We placed the phone approximately 7cm away from the drop and used a timer to capture the image. We used an eraser to help hold it in position while it was in the stand and then we used a folder to cover the back of the fluorimeter to keep all of the light out.


Placing Samples onto the Fluorimeter

  1. Step 1: First, we placed 80 microliters of SYBR Green 1 and 80 microliters of a calf thymus on the slide.
  2. Step 2: Then, we placed the box over the stand we created to meet up with the height of the camera.
  3. Step 3: Next, we aligned the drop to meet up with the LED light.
  4. Step 4: Then, we focused the camera on the drop.


Data Collection and Analysis

Images of High, Low, and Zero Calf Thymus DNA

(1) 5 μg/mL sample

Image:5ug-mL.png

(2) 0.5 μg/mL sample

Image:0.5ug-mL.png

(3) zero DNA

Image:0ug-mL.png


Calibrator Mean Values

Initial Concentration of 2X Calf Thymus DNA solution (μg/mL) Final DNA concentration in SYBR Green I solution (μg/mL) Sample Number RAWINTDEN DROP - BACKGROUND MEAN Standard Deviation
Image 1 Image 2 Image 3
00C-614278351134277741418592613964017466693.702
0.250.125C-519226506170739224656606927622165.6716441168.13
0.50.25C-41572185848006477461686073663231418132286.65
10.5C-3234662662493215722553661191311678116244512.5
21C-219196572178995562191137819669168.672047239.519
52.5C-121911378212251812139158321509380.67357943.8481

Calibration curves

Image:Calibrationcurve1group16.png

Image:CalibrationCurve2group16.png


Images of Our PCR Negative and Positive Controls

(1) Negative control PCR sample

Image:PCRnegative.png

(2) the Positive control PCR sample

Image:PCRpositive.png


PCR Results: PCR concentrations solved

PCR Product TUBE LABEL MEAN (of RAWINTDEN DROP - BACKGROUND) PCR Product Concentration (µg /mL)

(Step 5 calculation)

Total Dilution Initial PCR Product Concentration (µg /mL)

(Step 6 calculation)

G16P17325033.67-2.11249438912-25.34993267
G16N9674297.333-3.38761711112-40.65140533
G161-111230618.75-3.12823020812-37.5387625
G161-225825943.33-0.69567611112-8.348113333
G161-312141144-2.97647612-35.717712
G162-115417670-2.43038833312-29.16466
G162-216374828.67-2.27086188912-27.25034267
G162-310571880.33-3.23801994412-38.85623933


PCR Results: Summary

  • Our positive control PCR result was -25.34993267 μg/mL
  • Our negative control PCR result was -40.65140533 μg/mL


Observed results

  • Patient 30857 : This patient appeared to be negative because the sample was clear, just like the negative control.
  • Patient 75331 : This patient appeared to be positive because the sample was fluorescent green, just like the positive control.


Conclusions

  • Patient 30857 :Patients initial concentration values were closest to positive control. So, the patients results are positive.
  • Patient 75331: Patients intial concentration values were closest to negative control. So, the patients results are negative.



Personal tools