|
|
Comments:
- A large majority was already registered (80%)
- 44% participation from long term users (>1 year)
|
|
|
Comments:
- OWW community is truly diverse
- 'Other' comprises: Chemistry, Information Technology
|
|
|
Comments:
- Large majority is very familiar with Wiki-style editing
- Still, 30% would need further support.
|
|
|
Comments:
- Majority of 'independent' people (no OWW lab, or OWW involvement)
- we did not manage to reach students taking class on OWW.
- It seems that only 4 SC members took the survey.
|
|
|
Comments:
- others: community pages, BioSysBio-2007 abstract
|
|
|
Comments:
- Big proportion of people having access to private wiki.
|
|
|
Comments:
- Other communities: iGEM, Open Notebook Science Community, bioinformatics.org, openbiosource.org, Linux, Unix, Windows.
|
|
additional comments left by OWW users in this section:
- I didn\'t understand what you meant by private/public - is that a wiki were you have to register to edit versus no registration required for editing?
What do you define as Open Science community? Also couldn\'t answer that question.
- I am looking to enter the field of biological sciences, medicine and synthetic biology and would like to hear from different members of the community the best route towards this goal?
- Not really, stumbled upon an Endy lecture - bring me a beer.
|
|
Full Results for this section: CVS File
|
