PLA, PGA, and PLGA as biomaterials, by Colton Kenny

From OpenWetWare

Jump to: navigation, search

      Home                 Documents               Assignments               Wiki Schedule                 Wiki Pages                 Course Syllabus



The polymer materials of polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), and poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) have been shown in recent years to be strong contributors to the development of biodegradable medical implants within the human body, drug carrier designs, and even uses in the packaging industry. The immense utility of many of these polymers were over looked due to their degradation via hydrolysis. The increase in popularity can be attributed to a general increase in demand for biodegradable plastics [1]. More focus on environmental responsibility as well as a push away from plastics produced from fossil fuel sources, create a high demand for plastics that are both biodegradable and able to be produced from organic sources [2].

There are three main areas of use for PLA, PGA, and PLGA plastics: (1) Use a drug carrier in drug delivery applications (2) The promotion of cell growth and organ healing in cell scaffolds and other tissue engineered materials (3) The implementation of plastics in packaging materials [1,2]. It is also advantageous to utilize co-polymer and polymer blends of biodegradable monomers of PLA and PGA. PLGA is the most obvious example of Lactic Acid and Glycolic Acid co-polymerization. Some other common monomers that a co-polymerized with these monomers are malic acid or PEG [2]. Some of the properties that can be modified through blending and co-polymerizing these polymers are biodegradability, hydrophilicity, mechanical properties, physical properties, and surface topography [3,4].


1780 - Lactic Acid first discovered in 1780 by Carl Wilhelm Scheele (Experimental Chemist) [5]

1880s - Industrial production of Lactic Acid in US [5]

1944 - Study of Lactic Acid Condensation Polymers [6]

1954 - PGA became known [7]

1962 - PGA suture marketed as Dexon [7]

1974 - PGA-LLA (90:10) sutures developed [5]

1994 - Kanebo LTd. introduced Lactron PLLA fiber and spun-laid nonwovens [5].

1996 - Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. commercialized PLA produced by polycondensation route [5].

1997 - Formatin of Cargill Dow LLC, to commercialize PLA under the name NatureWorks [5].

2003 - Toyota produced PLA for automotive applications [5].

2005 - NatureWorksLLC and Teijin Limited formed 50-50 joint venture to market Ingeo bio-based thermoplastic resins [5].

2008 - PURAC started to commercialize solid lactide monomers under PURALACT [5].

2009 - PURAC, Sulzer, and Synbra announced production of PLA from solid lactide for foamed products [5].

2010 - Recombinant Escherichia coli to produce PLA [5].


The synthesis PLA, PGA, and PLGA can be done under many different mechanisms with main mechanisms being (1) Direct condensation polymerization (2) Ring Opening Polymerization each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages [1,2].

Polylactic Acid (PLA) and Polyglycolic Acid (PLGA)

The extraction of the monomers is often not conducted by synthetic means unlike conventional plastics. Currently, most Lactic acid is produced through a fermentation process, over a synthetic method [5]. While Glycolic acid is produced primarily through synthetic methods of a catalyzed reaction of formaldehyde with synthesis gas, natural extraction methods do exist [8].
Table 1: Methods of PLA Synthesis [1]
Table 1: Methods of PLA Synthesis [1]

Direct Condensation Polymerization

Direct condensation of PLA, PGA, and PLGA is the most simple way to produce these biomaterials, requiring the fewest manufacturing steps and easy modify and commercialize [2]. The main problems facing this method are in generally lower molecular weight product polymers. This is due to an equilibrium in reaction kinetics between the free acid, oligomers, and water produced [2]. Within the realm of the direct condensation synthesis method there are two sub-methods: solution and melt condensation polymerization.

Solution Condensation Polymerization: Solution condensation is advantageous because it only requires monomer and solvent to be reacted with an added heat source (~ 130-140 °C). By using a method of boiling water produced in a PLA polymerization reaction one can obtain relatively high molecular weights (MW ~ 300,000) over long reaction(~2 h) and drying periods using seives (~40 h) [9].

Melt Condensation Polymerization: Melt condensation does not require a solvent to illicit polymerization, but a heat source must keep the reacting solution above the melting temperature of the system (Tm ~180°C). A protonic acid can be added as a cocatalyst, improving the polarity of reacting system and reducing lactide byproducts over long time periods. In addition Results of MW ~10000 obtained [10].

Ring Opening Polymerization

Considered superior in product molecular weight as compared to direct condensation polymerization methods, ring opening polymerization of PLA, PGA, and PLGA use purified lactide and glycolide with catalyst present to conduct ring opening polymerization. The extra step of lactide and glycolide purification can often make this step more costly than other methods, even though the achievable molecular weights are much higher with this method [2].

Synthesis pathways of PLA [11].
Synthesis pathways of PLA [11].

Alternative Polymerization Methods

Azeoptropic Dehydrative Condensation



PLGA is primarily established using ring opening co-polymerization of both lactide and glycolide monomers in reaction [1].

Bio-degradation Mechanism

Being aliphatic polyesters PLA, PGA, and PLGA are flexible and all degrade at certain pH range. This degradation is conducted via hydrolic cleavage of the ester bonds between monomers. The Lactic acid and glycolic acid monomers can than be further degraded using common bodily processes [5].

Example: lactic acid → pyruvic acid → tricarboxylic acid cycle → CO2 and H2O

Bulk Modification

There are a certain set of critical factors when considering the bulk properties of polymer systems: chemical components, compositions, and morphological structure. With these factors one can vary hydrolytic groups, hydrophilic groups, and flexibility/crystallinity of the polymer chains. By co-polymerizing one biodegradable monomer with another, one can aid in weak properties of both monomers. PLGA is an example where crystallinity, high melting point, and poor solubility are properties brought to the table with glycolic acid (GA) and a slower degradation rate is shown in lactic acid (LA) [12]. By altering ratios between blends one may create a highly tailorable biomaterial for the needed application.

Surface Modification

Surface modifications of biodegradable biopolymers such as PLA, PGA, and PLGA are useful way to instill further biocompatibility to a material that already has applicable physical and mechanical properties to the target environment. There are many effective ways to modify the surface of a polymer product: physical, chemical, plasma, and radiation.

Plasma surface deposition can be shown to be highly substrate independent. This method shows highly efficient thin film deposition, adhesion to the substrate, and provides a surface which is both durable to physical and chemical abrasion [2]. In one case β-glucan (a substance that promotes wound healing in fungus) was grafted onto a PLGA (50:50) substrate via plasma and showed a significant increase cell proliferation [3] Another study showed an increase in cell proliferation on electrospun fibers that were treated with oxygen plasma and in-situ hydrophilic acrylic acid grafting [13].

Biomedical Applications

Many suitable materials can be used for biomedical applications. The main reason why biodegradable polymer components such as PLA, PGA and PLGA are selected over other materials is due to the need for only one implantation surgery (versus the typical case of needing two for implantation and extraction of the material). This can vastly improve a patients quality of life during operations and reduce risk to patient. PLA, PGA, PLGA, and other co-polymers have been approved by the US FDA and many other health agencies world wide for implantation in humans [5]. Even with this approval there have been some issues surrounding a drop in pH around implant area. If the lactic/glycolic acid of one of these biomaterials is degraded at a high rate the region can become more acidic, posing a problem to bone growth. A way that has been explored to combat this is through the addition of calcium phosphates and carbonates to PLLA implants [14].


polyglycolic acid (PGA) sutures that biodegrade over time Source
polyglycolic acid (PGA) sutures that biodegrade over time Source


With the tradename Dexon sutures made from PGA fibers PGA have been used to create biodegradable sutures since approximately 1962. A co-polymer version containing both polylactic acid and polyglycolic acid was developed not too far behind in 1974. Unlike conventional sutures these biodegradable sutures can be left in the patient without the need for a removal. There is also a chance of sutures made from other (non-biodegradable) materials to create a foreign body response which is less likely in a bio-compatible plastic [5]. With a co-polymer architecture even the time of degradation can be artfully controlled for certain suture needs.

Ligament/Tendon Repair

In early 1990, a PLLA fiber was used to augment a damaged knee ligament (anterior curciate ligament ACL). Traditionally this operation would be executed with autografts (Example: petellar tendons), but in the case where there is no autograft opportunity it has been shown that a PLLA fiber may be used as a substitute [15].

Rotator Cuff Surgery

Entangled 20 μm fibers were used in 2004 that were made by melt spinning PLLA (MW ~215,000). These fibers were woven into a felt, then evaluated for their use in the reconstruction of the infraspinatus (IS) tendon in the shoulder [16].

Electrospun Polymer Fibers

Electrospinning is using electrostatic forces on extruded material to overcome surface tension of said material. This approach provides excellent control over small scale morphology of desired biomaterial. This is extremely advantageous when trying to model the membranes and the extracellular matrix. Many materials can be seen produced through this process with a wide range of applications from drug delivery to tissue scaffolding [17].

Biodegradable Stents

Cardiovascular disease is a very big problem within the United States and many other people across the globe. Many times the most viable treatment is the stent of a weakened artery is the use of stents to widen the artery and provide improved blood flow where needed. In the past metallic stents have been used with success to provide this structural support to the cardiovascular system. More recently biodegradable stents have been seen attention as a way to promote healing of these damaged or weakened arteries while allowing for native tissue to repair the affected area. Due to different levels of wound severity, stents may need to provide artery structure support for different amounts of time. The tailored degradation of co-polymer biomaterials allows for this to be accomplished in-vivo without invasive secondary surgery for stent removal.

Saito et al. studies the effects of silcone vs. PLLA airway stents in rabbits. In the study eight rabbits were given silicon stents and eight were given stents made from PLLA. Silicon does not biodegrade and PLLA is known to have a very slow degradation rate when not co-polymerized with glycolic acid. The study found that three out of the eight rabbits with the silicon stents died within 4 weeks, while no rabbits with PLLA stents died during the experiment [18]. This shows the ability of PLLA and similar biomaterials to avoid bodily rejection of implanted stents.

Structural Meshes

Somewhat similar to stents are structural meshes, the essential difference is that stents are exclusively used to keep orifices and biological tubing open and functioning properly, while structural meshes are intended to provide greater support to large tissues. Bone development is a primary use for structural meshes where the bodies natural structural entity is damaged or missing. 3D constructs may also be utilized to further provide natural structure for wound healing.

Bone Fixation Components

PLLA bone fixation devices [5].
PLLA bone fixation devices [5].

Bone fixation components allow for the repair of severed or extremely damaged bone to be placed back together. Another use for bone fixation is in joint replacement where a more biological friendly material that will allow for native tissue growth is advantageous. Bone fixation components include screws, plates, pins and wires [5].

Much like stents these bone fixation devices are conventionally constructed of metallic object in the past. This poses large problems when attempting to use x-ray, CT and MRI imaging devices. Cancer treatment using radiation may also mistarget cancer site in favor of metallic implants [5].

Stress Shielding Effect

Stress shielding is an effect in a system containing one object of two components of different elastic moduli. In this effect load stress and strain are focused upon the object with lower elastic modulus. In the case of metal bone fixation devices, this load shielding is known to load stress and strain on joint between bone and metallic implant. Due to the softer, modular density attributes of polymer based biomaterials such as PGA, PLA, and PLGA, one can see the advantage over conventional metalic and other rigid objects [19].

Piezoelectric Effect

In addition to stress shielding mitigation some biodegratable polymer materials are able to emit electrical impulses when a force is applied upon them. This type of small electrical signal has shown to improve bone growth and healing. This ability is known as a piezoelectric effect. This occurs within PLLA crystals due to asymmetric carbon repeating unit of main chain. When this polymer is oriented by a drawing process, an electrical potential difference can be witnessed across the material [5].


[1] Xiao, L.; Wang, B.; Yang, G.; Gauthier, M. Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Biomaterials: Synthesis, Modification and Applications. Biomedical Science, Engineering and Technology. 2012, pp. 247-282.

[2] Cheng, Y.; Deng, S.; Chen, P.; Ruan, R. Polylactic acid (PLA) synthesis and modification: a review. Front. Chem. China. 2009, 4(3). pp. 259-264.

[3] Lee, S. G.; An, E. Y.; Lee, J. B.; Park, J. C.; Shin, J. W.; Kim, G. K., Enhanced cell affinity of poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (50/50) by plasma treatment with β-(1 → 3) (1 → 6)-glucan. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 201, 5128.

[4] Sasatsu, M.; Onishi, H.; Machida, Y.,In vitro and in vivo characterization of nanoparticles made of MeO-PEG amine/PLA block copolymer and PLA. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 317,167.

[5] Auras, R.; Lim L.; Selke, S. E. M.; Tsuji, H. Poly(Lactic Acid): Synthesis, Structures, Properties, Processing, and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: [Online], 2010.

[6] Filachione, E. M.; Fisher, C. H., Lactic Acid Condensation Polymers. Ind.. Eng. Chem. 1944, 36, 223.

[7] Gilding, D. K.; A. M. Reed. Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery - polyglycolic/poly (lactic acid) homo- and copolymers: 1. Polymer. 1979. 20 (12): 1459–1464.

[8] Loder, D. J. U.S. Patent 2,152,852. 1939.

[9] Ajioka, M.; Enomoto, K.; Suzuki, K., Basic Properties of Polylactic Acid Produced by the Direct Condensation Polymerization of Lactic Acid. Bull.Chem.Soc. Jpn, 1995

[10] Sung, I. M.; Chan, W. L.; Masatoshi, M., Melt polycondensation of L-lactic acid with Sn(II) catalysts activated by various proton acids: A direct manufacturing route to high molecular weight Poly(L-lactic acid),Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem., 2000, 38, 1673

[11] Gupta, B.; Revagade, N.; Hilborn J. Poly(lactic acid) fiber: An overview. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32. 455-482.

[12] Mooney, D. J., Breuer, M. D., Mcnamara, K., Vacanti, J. P., Langer. R. Fabricating Tubular Devices from Polymers of Lactic and Glycolic Acid for Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng. 1995, 1, 107.

[13] Park, K.; Ju, Y. M.; Son, J. S.; Ahn, K. D.; Han, D. K., Surface modification of biodegradable electrospun nanofiber scaffolds and their interaction with fibroblasts. Biomater. Sci. Polymer. 2007, 18, 369.

[14] Yaszemski, M. J.; Payne, R.G.; Hayes, W. C.; Langer, R.; Mikos, A. G. Evolution of bone transplantation: molecular, cellular and tissue strategies to engineer human bone. Biomaterials 1996, 17, 175-185.

[15] Trager, D.; Pohle, K.; Tschirner, W. Anterior curciate ligament suture in comparison with plasty : A 5-year follow-up study. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 1995, 114,278-280

[16] Aoki, M.; Miyamoto, S.; Okamura, K.; Yamashita, T.; Ikada, Y.; Malsuda, S.Tensile properties and biological response of poly(L-lactic acid) felt graft: an experimental trial for rotator-cuff reconstruction. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B, 2004, 71B, 252-259.

[17] Luu, Y.K.; Kim, K.; Hsiao, B.S.; Chu, B.; Hadjiargyrou, M. Development of a nanosructured DNA delivery scaffold via electrospinning of PLGA and PLA-PEG block copolymers. Journal of Controlled Release.2003, 89, pp. 341-353.

[18] Saito, Y.; Minami, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Nakao, Y.; Omiya, H.; Imamura, H.; Sakaida, N.; Okamura, A.; New tubular bioabsorbable knitted airway stent: biocompatibility and mechanical strength. J. Thor. Card. Surg. 2002, pp 161-167

[19] Dai, K.; in: Poitout, D. G.; Kotz, R. (Eds.), Biomechanics and Biomaterials in Orthopedics, Springer, 2004.

Personal tools