User:Alexander L. Davis/Notebook/The psychology of empirical data sharing: Coherence, Correspondence and Performance/2012/02/15

From OpenWetWare

Jump to: navigation, search
Project name Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

Entry title

I worry most about motivation and communication in MIMECCC. The external validity is clearly bad. Blinding is an internal validity issue.

In the core space OPFFPE. Ontology is the most important: do we get the types and predicates right. The rest is just structure learning.

1) Interview 1: “I’d like for us to both guess it right. But since I don’t have the supporting data, I want to win the game” a. Decided since it was going to be too hard, to just game it. b. I know the rule is wrong but I want to win the game. 2) Even if the researcher wanted to be altruistic, he could only do this and not get kicked out of academia without lying. 3) Not clear that th person could propose additional #s 4) Example of an acceptable rule 5) People have trouble finding/using he feedback button 6) Takes about 10 minutes to get through the beginning 7) Remove additional definition of trial 8) Give them an idea of what the other person will see. 9) Maybe 30 minutes after 1st 2 pages begin 10) Please explain how you/other person earn bonus money.

Comments

  • Insert content here...

Unexpected Observations

  • Insert content here...

New Hypotheses

  • Insert content here...

Current Protocol

  • Insert content here...

Current Materials

  • Insert content here...

New Data

Participant 1

  • Insert content here...

Participant 2

  • Insert content here...

Faults

  • Insert content here...

Corrections

  • Insert content here...



Personal tools