BMCB625:DNA Replication: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
===Chris=== | ===Chris=== | ||
====Lopes et al (UV-irrad of S. cerevisiae; EM grids and 2-D gel electrophoresis)==== | ====Lopes et al (UV-irrad of S. cerevisiae; EM grids and 2-D gel electrophoresis)==== | ||
# | # Lopes and colleagues never actually demonstrate that the ssDNA is actually located on the strand opposite the UV photoproducts. Suggest a possible way in which this may be elucidated. | ||
====Heller and Marians (Biochemical purification and modifications using E.coli and chemical Mods.)==== | ====Heller and Marians (Biochemical purification and modifications using E.coli and chemical Mods.)==== | ||
Revision as of 21:15, 8 April 2007
(Homework) Questions
Larry
Lopes et al
- What observations lead to the authors' suggestion that discontinuites left randomly behind the fork are not immediately sealed after the passage of the replication fork? Larry's Question Page
Heller and Marians
- How did the author cleverly show that the same DnaB from the lagging strand was involved in leading strand reinitation? Larry's Question Page
Chayne
Jon
Chris
Lopes et al (UV-irrad of S. cerevisiae; EM grids and 2-D gel electrophoresis)
- Lopes and colleagues never actually demonstrate that the ssDNA is actually located on the strand opposite the UV photoproducts. Suggest a possible way in which this may be elucidated.
Heller and Marians (Biochemical purification and modifications using E.coli and chemical Mods.)
- More
Mahta
Jeremy
_
