BMCB625:Mathematics in Biology: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== | ==Discussion/Homework Questions== | ||
===Mahta=== | ===Mahta=== | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
==Faculty Questions and Comments== | ==Faculty Questions and Comments== | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 08:06, 4 June 2007
Overview of Topic
1.) Take Home Message (Big Picture / Themes):
- A.) Common Languages for Quantitative Biology
- B.) Probability in Gene Expression
2.) Important Experimental Details
Papers
Outline of Talk and Discussion
-
- Introduction: Perspectives between disciplines and the Language of Biology
- Can we develop a common language? Is it mathematics? Should it be? In what cases?
-
- Classic Biological Underpinning by Mathematical (Statistical) Arguments
- Luria-Delbrück Fluctuation Analysis
-
- Static Picture of Dynamic Pathways
- The Lac Operon as a Model of Bistability and Stochastic Events
-
- Discussion
PAPERS:
- MAIN PAPER: "Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli"
- EM Ozbudak, et al, Nature 427, 737-740 (19 February 2004)
[[1]]
- CLASSIC: "Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance"
- S. E. Luria and M. Delbrück, Genetics. 1943 November; 28(6): 491–511
[[2]]
- See Below: "Biologists Fixing Radios" [[3]]
Chris - Bonus Materials
Ranking:
- Critical Read/of Outstanding Interest (oo)
- Importand Read (o)
- Of Interest (no label)
- (o) A good primer on how biologists and engineers look at a problem in different ways; while many comments do not address the complexity of biochemistry and genetics, it does provide an interesting perspective on what we consider "important." Also, of importance, in my opinion, is developing a common language by which numerous disciplines can communicate. I'll touch more on this particular topic during my talk.
Y. Lazebnik, "Can a Biologist Fix a Radio? or, What I Learned while Studying Apoptosis" [[4]]