BME100 s2015:Group1 9amL6: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 33: Line 33:
B. Steps taken to prevent error include 3 different samples for each patient. PCR controls include  
B. Steps taken to prevent error include 3 different samples for each patient. PCR controls include  
C. According to the class's final data from the BME100_fa2014_PCRResults spreadsheet,  
C. According to the class's final data from the BME100_fa2014_PCRResults spreadsheet,  
[[Image:PCR_table.PNG]]
<!-- [[Image:PCR_table.PNG]] -->





Revision as of 13:10, 8 April 2015

BME 100 Spring 2015 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help


OUR COMPANY

Name: Shawn Striker
Name: Jonathan Moreno
Name: Grace Kim
Name: Triston Hudson
Name: Ryan Meyer


LAB 6 WRITE-UP

Bayesian Statistics

Overview of the Original Diagnosis System

A. 8 groups of 5-6 students each diagnosed 2 patients, thus 16 patients total. B. Steps taken to prevent error include 3 different samples for each patient. PCR controls include C. According to the class's final data from the BME100_fa2014_PCRResults spreadsheet,


What Bayes Statistics Imply about This Diagnostic Approach

The Bayes values for calculation 1 were close to 1.00
The Bayes values for calculation 2 were close to 1.00

Three possible sources of human or machine/device error that could have occurred during the PCR & detection steps include


The Bayes values for calculation 1 were not very close to 1.00, but closer to 1.00 than 0.00
The Bayes values for calculation 2 were close to 1.00


3 1 4 2

Computer-Aided Design

TinkerCAD


Our Design





Feature 1: Consumables Kit

Feature 2: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter