IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Ideas: Difference between revisions
Peixuan Pey (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Peixuan Pey (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
===== Cell self-destruction ===== | ===== Cell self-destruction ===== | ||
===== A bionsensor for CO ===== | ===== A bionsensor for CO ===== | ||
=== Brainstorming Morning 13.07.2007 === | === Brainstorming Morning 13.07.2007 === | ||
==== Group 1 ==== | ==== Group 1 ==== | ||
====Ben, Cheuk, Lucas, Maira Facilitator: Frank==== | ====Ben, Cheuk, Lucas, Maira, Facilitator: Frank==== | ||
===== Battery bacteria ===== | ===== Battery bacteria ===== | ||
Line 73: | Line 74: | ||
===== Gobbler bacteria ===== | ===== Gobbler bacteria ===== | ||
Eat Influenza virus or HIV virus | Eat Influenza virus or HIV virus | ||
==== Group 2 ==== | ==== Group 2 ==== | ||
====Alex, Dirk, Peixuan Facilitator: Vincent==== | ====Alex, Dirk, Peixuan, Facilitator: Vincent==== | ||
===== In Vitro Protein Synthesis ===== | ===== In Vitro Protein Synthesis ===== | ||
Line 83: | Line 85: | ||
*[http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/112605626/ABSTRACT Effects of growth rate on cell extract performance in cell-free protein synthesis] | *[http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/112605626/ABSTRACT Effects of growth rate on cell extract performance in cell-free protein synthesis] | ||
*[http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ge.07.120173.001411 In Vitro Synthesis of Protein in Microbial Systems] | *[http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ge.07.120173.001411 In Vitro Synthesis of Protein in Microbial Systems] | ||
===== A Driving Sensor ===== | ===== A Driving Sensor ===== | ||
Line 121: | Line 122: | ||
===== Bacteria that neutralises greenhouse gases (cows)===== | ===== Bacteria that neutralises greenhouse gases (cows)===== | ||
Once again, a gut bacterium can be altered, or a bacterium can be made to absorb and breakdown CO, CO2, or polymerize methane. | Once again, a gut bacterium can be altered, or a bacterium can be made to absorb and breakdown CO, CO2, or polymerize methane. | ||
====Characteization of a Chassis==== | |||
1. Rate of replication | |||
2. Plasmid permeability | |||
3. Type of vectors | |||
4. How long it stays adhered to the surface | |||
5. Suitable environmental conditions | |||
6. Compatibiliy issues Chassis VS Biobricks | |||
7. Structure and physical features] | |||
8. Genome information | |||
9. Safety issues | |||
10. Stability and predictability | |||
11. Life span | |||
12. Cell-cell communication | |||
==== Characterizatio of Basic Parts of a Biobrick==== | |||
=====Promoter/Sensor===== | |||
Sensitivity | |||
Specificity | |||
Substrates invoved | |||
Spatial patterns (intra/intercells) | |||
Saturation range/kinetics | |||
Inducible/repressible | |||
=====Operator===== | |||
Other regulatory factors (methylation, sigma factors) | |||
Length of gene | |||
Physical conditions (contraints) | |||
=====Gene of interest===== | |||
Codon optimization | |||
Length | |||
Cleavage sites | |||
POPs | |||
Accessibility (e.g.RBS) | |||
Fusion Protein | |||
=====Reporter===== | |||
Light intensity (analogue signal) | |||
Response time and fucntion | |||
Color | |||
Smell | |||
Spaial Patterns | |||
Protein trafficking/diffusion | |||
POPs | |||
==== Group 3 ==== | ==== Group 3 ==== | ||
====Anthony, James, Jerry Facilitator: Matthieu==== | ====Anthony, James, Jerry, Facilitator: Matthieu==== | ||
===== Idea 1 ===== | ===== Idea 1 ===== | ||
===== Idea 2 ===== | ===== Idea 2 ===== |
Revision as of 08:58, 14 July 2007
Brainstormings
Vincent 06:05, 3 May 2007 (EDT): You can start posting ideas about possible projects for our iGEM summer. Don't try to limit your imagination, everything is possible in the wonderful world of Synthetic Biology.
Johnsy 00:06, 6 May 2007 (EDT): Well, almost anything...good luck with your project... and if you allow me, I'll make a few comments here and there.
Baijiongjun : Looking forward to all the "WoW" ideas :P
Preliminary Brainstorming 12.07.2007
We had a preliminary brainstorming session today. Here is a list of ideas that came up:
Distill seawater
Remove heavy metals from water
Remove methane from air or cow gut
Trap CO2 from the atmosphere
Biofilm wrapping for food
Biofilm over tissue for repairs
Biofuels
Randomisation
Bacteria that make coffee fresh
Memory
Artificial bacteria
Degrading plastic
Biochip
Cell programming
Autoimmune disease
Target cancer cells
Cell self-destruction
A bionsensor for CO
Brainstorming Morning 13.07.2007
Group 1
Ben, Cheuk, Lucas, Maira, Facilitator: Frank
Battery bacteria
Make use of proton pumps e.g. ATPase
Bacterial lamp
Make use of bioluminescence of Vibrio fischeri or Firefly
Rust-preventing bacteria
Bacteria to form biofilm that wraps metal and to self-destruct on demand
Vitamin-producing bacteria
Fertilizer-producing bacteria
Bacteria to produce nitrogen-containing compounds or plant growth factors e.g. auxin
Water-retaining bacteria
Bacteria to capture water and store water as crystals in the top soil
pH-controller bacteria
To prevent adverse effects of acid rain on the soil
Bacteria that prevent eutrophication
Air-freshener bacteria
Bacteria to take up unpleasant stench
Solar-powered bacteria
Make use of photosynthesizing bacteria
Fat-absorbing bacteria
Used to cure heart diseases, clear arterial blockage
Mucus-eating bacteria
Prevents asthma attack, clear mucus to prevent narrowing of windpipe
Exo/endocytotic bacteria
Treat diabetes by releasing insulin at high glucose levels and taking up insulin at low glucose levels
Gobbler bacteria
Eat Influenza virus or HIV virus
Group 2
Alex, Dirk, Peixuan, Facilitator: Vincent
In Vitro Protein Synthesis
- In vitro protein synthesis (ambion)
- In vitro gene expression (promega)
- EasyXpress Protein Synthesis Mini Kit (Qiagen)
- Effects of growth rate on cell extract performance in cell-free protein synthesis
- In Vitro Synthesis of Protein in Microbial Systems
A Driving Sensor
A Bacteria Made Meal
By adding bacteria to a block of wood, the cellulose in the wood would be digested to an edible form for human consumption.
Working with Yeast
Yeast, unlike bacteria, is an eukaryote, and thus is able to synthesis a wider range of proteins, and is also more suitable for integrating into humans.
Working with Lactobacillus Casei Shirota
The fact that this bacteria is ingestible and extremely helpful to our digestive system, is a widely known fact. This can aid in commercialisation and integration into the food market, much better than a model bacteria E.coli. Also, it can be genetically engineered to make vitamins and essential amino acids that would allow many vitamin defciencies in third world countries to be solved.
Electrical Biological Interface
Minimal Bacteria Frame
Instead of building an artificial bacteria from scratch, we can minimise the housekeeping genes of a bacterium such that most of the biobrick systems would be able to intergrate easily into it without worrying about excessive crosstalking between protein components.
Farts that smell like Bananas
A gut bacteria can be engineered to become a biosensor for e.g. a lack of nutrients, and produce a certain small as an indication.
Another measument tool for gene expression other than PoPs
This will enable more versatility between the biobricks system and generic inputs and outputs.
Another more expressive cell component other than gene expression
Gene expression can be rather slow and tedious due to the time lag of activation, transription and translation. In the case of a biosensor, if another method can be found that is able to react faster to the inputs applied, it would be an advancement in the field of synthetic biology.
Characterization of different parts of a gene and type of organism used
This is the essential crux of synthetic biology.
Fragrant bacteria/biosensor in the mouth
This is similar to the one above " Farts that smell like Bananas ".
Fat Absorbing Bacteria
This bacteria can be placed in the gut and absorb the fats that are present in our food. This can be a dieting breakthrough!
Bacteria that neutralises greenhouse gases (cows)
Once again, a gut bacterium can be altered, or a bacterium can be made to absorb and breakdown CO, CO2, or polymerize methane.
Characteization of a Chassis
1. Rate of replication 2. Plasmid permeability 3. Type of vectors 4. How long it stays adhered to the surface 5. Suitable environmental conditions 6. Compatibiliy issues Chassis VS Biobricks 7. Structure and physical features] 8. Genome information 9. Safety issues 10. Stability and predictability 11. Life span 12. Cell-cell communication
Characterizatio of Basic Parts of a Biobrick
Promoter/Sensor
Sensitivity Specificity Substrates invoved Spatial patterns (intra/intercells) Saturation range/kinetics Inducible/repressible
Operator
Other regulatory factors (methylation, sigma factors) Length of gene Physical conditions (contraints)
Gene of interest
Codon optimization Length Cleavage sites POPs Accessibility (e.g.RBS) Fusion Protein
Reporter
Light intensity (analogue signal) Response time and fucntion Color Smell Spaial Patterns Protein trafficking/diffusion POPs
Group 3
Anthony, James, Jerry, Facilitator: Matthieu
Idea 1
Idea 2
Idea 3
Notes on Brainstorming Techniques
- Brainstorming sessions work best if there is a specific problem or opportunity statement to guide the thinking, that describes what is to be achieved or investigated. However, the statement must not hint at the type of solution, as this may hinder idea generation. It is often suggested that thinkers not look into other solutions to the problem before brainstorming, as this tends to restrict the line of thinking to already existing solutions and results in similar answers.
- Appointing a facilitator also aids in the process. This person should state the objective, keep track of time, and make sure the session rules are obeyed. They must ensure that the session runs smoothly, that participants feel comfortable, that everyone participates, and they will also rekindle the creative process if it slows down. The facilitator position is sensitive, though. It is often prudent to appoint a person from outside the group, without a vested interest, biased point of view, or complicated relation to other members of the group.
- Participants should be encouraged to develop each others ideas further, or to use other ideas to create new ones. However, single ideas should not be discussed for too long.
- Plenty of paper and pens should be available for writing down thoughts. All thinkers should have a writing pad, and if possible, flip-charts should be within easy reach for everyone. All ideas should be written down, without discrimination.
- An enthusiastic, uncritical attitude should be encouraged - it must be ensured that no one criticises or evaluates ideas during the session. Criticism adds an element of risk to proposing new ideas, and this stifles the creativity and flow of the session. In no way should participants be made to feel criticised, uncomfortable, or threatened (i.e. mean looks, derogatory jokes, imposing body language, supervisors hovering behind participants, etc. should all be avoided.)
- The environment and arrangement of participants will also affect the process. Richer environments tend to produce better sessions than bland ones, but distractions should be avoided. Participants should, ideally, sit around a circular table, such that each individual has an equal standing and no one becomes the focus of attention by virtue of their position (that is, avoid having a 'head of table').
- Having random material such as books, magazines, toys, strange objects, etc. may help rekindle the process if it slows down, or offer a source of inspiration. However, participants must not spend too much time with these - ten or twenty seconds should be enough, but more may interfere with focus.
For those who want to read more about brainstorming, the following references were useful. In particular, the Wikipedia article linked below gives a very good overview of the process, and of a few different methods to conduct a session.