IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Ideas: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Brainstormings==
'''[[User:Vincent|Vincent]] 06:05, 3 May 2007 (EDT)''': You can start posting ideas about possible projects for our iGEM summer. Don't try to limit your imagination, everything is possible in the wonderful world of Synthetic Biology.
'''[[User:Vincent|Vincent]] 06:05, 3 May 2007 (EDT)''': You can start posting ideas about possible projects for our iGEM summer. Don't try to limit your imagination, everything is possible in the wonderful world of Synthetic Biology.


Line 7: Line 5:
[[User:Baijiongjun|Baijiongjun]] : Looking forward to all the "WoW" ideas :P
[[User:Baijiongjun|Baijiongjun]] : Looking forward to all the "WoW" ideas :P


==Feasibility Criteria==
The feasibilty criteria to facilitate the selection of ideas from our brainstorm sessions - simplistic from realistic; ambitious from ridiculous.


[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Ideas/Feasibility | Feasibility criteria]]
=Discarded Ideas@Imperial.iGEM2007=
 
==[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Ideas/Feasibility | Feasibility criteria]]==
We devised a feasibilty criteria to facilitate the systematic selection of ideas from our brainstorm sessions that ranged from simplistic to realistic; ambitious to ridiculous.
 
 
==Brainstormings==
 
===Notes on Brainstorming Techniques===
 
* Brainstorming sessions work best if there is a specific problem or opportunity statement to guide the thinking, that describes what is to be achieved or investigated. However, the statement must not hint at the type of solution, as this may hinder idea generation. It is often suggested that thinkers not look into other solutions to the problem before brainstorming, as this tends to restrict the line of thinking to already existing solutions and results in similar answers.
* Appointing a ''facilitator'' also aids in the process. This person should state the objective, keep track of time, and make sure the session rules are obeyed. They must ensure that the session runs smoothly, that participants feel comfortable, that everyone participates, and they will also rekindle the creative process if it slows down. The facilitator position is sensitive, though. It is often prudent to appoint a person from outside the group, without a vested interest, biased point of view, or complicated relation to other members of the group.
* Participants should be encouraged to develop each others ideas further, or to use other ideas to create new ones. However, single ideas should not be discussed for too long.
* Plenty of paper and pens should be available for writing down thoughts. All thinkers should have a writing pad, and if possible, flip-charts should be within easy reach for everyone. All ideas should be written down, without discrimination.
* An enthusiastic, uncritical attitude should be encouraged - it must be ensured that no one criticises or evaluates ideas during the session. Criticism adds an element of risk to proposing new ideas, and this stifles the creativity and flow of the session. In no way should participants be made to feel criticised, uncomfortable, or threatened (i.e. mean looks, derogatory jokes, imposing body language, supervisors hovering behind participants, etc. should all be avoided.)
* The environment and arrangement of participants will also affect the process. Richer environments tend to produce better sessions than bland ones, but distractions should be avoided. Participants should, ideally, sit around a circular table, such that each individual has an equal standing and no one becomes the focus of attention by virtue of their position (that is, avoid having a 'head of table').
* Having random material such as books, magazines, toys, strange objects, etc. may help rekindle the process if it slows down, or offer a source of inspiration. However, participants must not spend too much time with these - ten or twenty seconds should be enough, but more may interfere with focus.
 
For those who want to read more about brainstorming, the following references were useful. In particular, the Wikipedia article linked below gives a very good overview of the process, and of a few different methods to conduct a session.
 
====References====


== The iGEM Competition ==
[http://www.brainstorming.co.uk/tutorials/preparingforbrainstorming.html Brainstorming.co.uk] <br>
[http://www.mindtools.com/brainstm.html Mindtools.com] <br>
[http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/brainstorming.html UNC.edu] <br>
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainstorming Wikipedia]


=== The iGEM Competition ===
Here is a list of [http://www.igem2006.com/results.htm winners in 2006]. From the list, it is difficult to work out if all categories have equal weight in determining the overall winner, if some are more important than others, or if the overall winner is not selected based upon the other prizes.
Here is a list of [http://www.igem2006.com/results.htm winners in 2006]. From the list, it is difficult to work out if all categories have equal weight in determining the overall winner, if some are more important than others, or if the overall winner is not selected based upon the other prizes.


Line 28: Line 48:
* Best Real-World Application
* Best Real-World Application


====Now on to the list...====
----


 
==== Cell self-destruction====
== Current Ideas ==
 
 
 
===[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System|Hrp System]]===
This project is being carried forward. For more information, see the project page, linked above.
 
<br>
 
===[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Biofilm Detector|The Biofilm Detector]]===
This project is being carried forward. For more information, see the project page, linked above.
 
'''[[User:TomH|Tom]] 07:41, 24 July 2007 (EDT)''' I would just like to comment that I really really like this idea. Well done whoever thought this up! I think you are right in that penetration and survivability in the biofilm are very key problems. Good luck with it! Also, this Hrp system looks well snazzy. An AND gate with up to 3 inputs! If you can characterise it you're in for some top prizes, I reckon.
 
===Cell-by Date (Now Refocused - See Main Project Page)===
 
====Summary====
Fresh meat is a highly perishable food product and unless appropriately actions are taken, e.g., packaged, transported and stored at refrigeration temperatures, can spoil in relatively short time. Factors affecting meat spoilage include intrinsic (e.g., pH, aw, composition, type, and extent of initial contamination) and extrinsic parameters (e.g., temperature and  packaging atmosphere).
 
Among these, temperature is considered the most important factor. Although most countries have established regulations with maximum temperature limits for refrigeration storage, in practice these are often violated. Survey studies have shown that temperature conditions higher than 10°C are not unusual during transportation, retail storage, and consumer handling. Such temperature abuses during any stage of the chill chain may result in an unexpected loss of quality and a significant decrease of meat shelf life.
 
Surveys conducted also show that 1 in 3 consumers actually use food that is past the expiry date (this has been "verified" across the imperial igem team). Consumer ignorance, together with the lack of transparency in food processing and packaging are perhaps the two main factors for the 76,000 cases of food poisoning reported in the UK in 2006, many more presumingly under-reported.
 
The huge task at hand is whether or not we can find an application in synthetic biology to solve this modern-day crisis - a better indicator to distinguish meat that is fit for consumption rather than visual and olfactory examination (or the date that is written on your food labels that no one really reads).
 
Challenge tests are the main current method used by the meat industry and academia to evaluate product’s shelf life. This is however valid only to the conditions that are tested in the lab, clearly impractical for a multitude of reasons.
 
====Specifications====
* No contact with the food.
* Want at least to inputs into our system in an 'OR' gate.
* We would like a visual signal.
* System must be stable for the lifetime of the food.
* Need system to be able to work in a suitable location, e.g. if food item is in a fridge.
 
====Design (now re-focused see below)====
A predictive microbiological sensor, this has two aspects to it;
 
# We aim to design a biological prediction method to predict the microbiological growth within a food sample. We plan to achieve prediction by designing a system that starts with a defined low density population of E.coli and then allow this to grow under similar conditions to those found in the food, e.g. pH and temperature. Once the cell density reaches a density level that would be typical of that found in spoiled food, a fluorescent signal will be triggered.
# The second aspect of our 'cell-by-date' system is to monitor the temperature that the food is exposed to. In various studies, temperature has been shown to be the most significant factor in the spoiling of foods. We plan to manipulate the heat shock promoter to allow us to trigger a fluorescent signal when exposed to a set temperature and so to show that the food has been exposed to a particular temperature.
 
====Re-Focused Design (Thanks to supervisors)====
 
#No More population density measurement
##Live, cant comply with standards
##Non-integrative function - no processive power
##Problems with noise; GFP degradation in a live system
##Difficulty in integration of both inuputs of cell density and temperature activation
##Requirement for a more elegant design
 
Re-focussed design:
#Based on in-vitro expression of cell-free extract (CFE) medium to comply with HSA standards (no bacteria next to food)
#CFE are known to be stable of up to 4 days - in working range of highly perishable foods
#Ability to perform gene expression that would lead to a cumulative response in the form of a visible, stable protein.
#Use of firefly genes cf. GFP. More stable and visible over a range of colour spectrum.
#Colour schemes provide more information to consumers - Focus on supermarket-fridge-consumption phases.  Sets out to answer the question: Is this good to eat ? Looks good semells good but...
 
Experimental design:
#Temperature increases the rate of reactions - increased temperature means faster gene expression over a given time.
#System only deals with protein synthesis and its reporter function - a visual signal.
#Coupling firefly genes with that of a well-characterized consitutive promoter, response is good.
#We will then calibrate the synthesis of fluorescent protein (which is easier as opposed to calibrating cell density) with that of the predicted shelf-life (date label).
##Assuming the cold chain process only occurs at 4oC, it will lead to the predicted outcome.
##Any temperature increases, and over a threshold would lead to over the range fluorescence.
##Degradation of protein is minimal with fine-tuning of cell free medium characterization
##Proof of principle of the application of CFE.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
===== Problems =====
 
# Modelling:
## Need memory/integration Can't Give RFP in response to a pulse
## Does system act as an effective integrator ?
# Part Specific Design
## How many parts available in registry
# Does system really have WoW ! Factor ?
## What additional components could change this ?
# Promoters : Heat Schock induction
# Timeline - Proposal needs schedule for project
# Initial Cell Density enough for a GFP response ?
# Commercially available alternative ?
# NOVELTY : September 2002 - Problem seems to have been already tackled by material scientists [http://www.advance.uri.edu/pacer/september2002/story8.htm MatSciCellByDate]<br>
##Field name may be SSM (Stimuli Sensitive Materials) [http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:V1PlCUfkpoMJ:www.ntcresearch.org/pdf-rpts/AnRp01/M98-A16-A1.pdf+Heat+Sensitive+Materials&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=uk SSM]<br>
##Intelligent colling systems in addition to predictive microbiology could mean our system is unneccessary [http://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2005/techprogram/P14844.HTM IntelligenCooling] suggest refocus on Average Joe and food in his fridge<br>
## Antimicrobial Agents have been developed which prevent the formation of spoiling microbes during transport [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00103.x AntiMicrob]<br>
 
===== Modelling =====
The main problem associated with modelling is that we would wish to model cell growth at varying temperatures. There are many models that are available for cell growth, however we would need to expand on these and include the additional varibale temperature.
 
===== Fluorescent Signal =====
* The first problem is that a fluorescent signal will only be visible if a cell population is at a certain density. This is because there needs to be a great enough density of cells expressing a fluorescent protein so that there is a strong enough signal to be visible by eye. This will be a problem if the cells are exposed to varying conditions early on in the sell by date when cell population is low.
* The fluorescent proteins expressed will also need to be relatively stable from degradation. This is because if we initiate the expression of the fluorescent proteins then we want the signal to be sustained so that our 'cell-by-date' has a memory.
**A further point on this is that we can't use GFP as a reporter in hypoxic conditions [http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/61/12/4784 GFPHypoxic] <br>
**Possible solution to this problem is to use a reporter with a long Half-Life so that there is enough time for someone to see the signal being outputted by our system. EGFP Seems to be one such reporter having a half life that may exceed 24hours<sup>1</sup>. Enocding vector found for EGFP that places it under control of Plac promoter<sup>4</sup>.  DsRed seems to be another possible reporter to use<sup>3</sup>.<br>
* In order to avoid complication in design we have opted to just use one reporter, RFP, instead of using two eg. transition from GFP to RFP when problems occour.  This is due to time constraints - it make take time for the RFP to overcome the GFP.<br>
 
 
 
 
<biblio>
#1 pmid=11313827
#2 [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01344.x?cookieSet=1 ImplementationOfEGFP]
#3 [http://www.mpibpc.gwdg.de/abteilungen/200/publications/pdf/FEBS_Lett._479_131-135.pdf DsRed]
#4 [http://66.102.1.104/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:2LQnsulowsUJ:www.bdbiosciences.com/clontech/archive/JAN97UPD/PDF/JAN97TechTip.pdf+EGFP+ecoli EGFP promoter]
</biblio>
 
===== Constructs =====
#The heat shock promoter is a slow protein to expresss. Studies have shown that it takes 5 hours for the promoter to go from low to high, meaning for the maximum output of PoPS from the heat shock promoter will take 5 hours.
 
===== Tests =====
 
*All sensory operations would occur within the environment of the fridge, which is maintained at a temperature of about 4 degrees celsius.
*Food spoiling processes take a long time and are hard to quantify.
*food spoilage constitutes an array of microflora, under many parameters (incl. various ways of packaging meat.
 
==== Solution ====
*Concept of predictive microbiology
**involves knowledge of microbial growth responses to environmental factors expressed in quantitative terms by mathematical equations (in other words, extensive modelling).
**data and models can be stored in databases and used to interpret the effect of processing, distribution, and storage conditions on microbial growth.
 
*the combination of data on the temperature history of the product and mathematical models may lead to “intelligent” product management systems for the optimization of food quality and safety at the time of consumption.
 
*we also know a great deal about the colonization of bacterial spp. under varying conditions of temperature and pH. Effects of Photobacterium phosphoreum, pseudomonads, Shewanella putrefaciens, and Brochothrix thermosphacta, have been published.
** In particular, Psudeomonads are a strong spoilage index indicator due to its quick growth response under increased temperature
 
Therefore, using research modelling as a means of input to specify the growth conditions of our isolated bacteria, we could develop a temp + pH sensitive bacteria that estimates the time frame in which meat would go bad (using quorum sensing and controlled cell growth), with GFP as an output.
 
Why consider the project?
*Modelling saves lots of time (eventually the parameters will be used as an input to control and regulate cell growth of E.coli)
*Potential for extensive use in the F&B industry
*parts that are required can be easily obtained, and we could also recycle the previous proposals (so our initial efforts do not go to waste)
*Gimmicky project name tag - easily received and marketable (since everyone faces the same problems, avg. joe and microbiologists alike)
*Potential use of Hrp system? (temperature activation may require a quick response time to generate increased growth rate responses)
 
==== Potential problems ====
*Is this synthetic biology?! (as opposed to the classic gene cloning and insertion into different chassis)
*spoilage models remain a research tool rather than an effective industrial application due to several reasons:
**developed models were based on observations in a well-controlled laboratory environment with microbiological media. Predictions based on such models are not necessarily valid in complex food environments such as meat.
**lack of information required for the application of models for predicting the shelf life of specific food products
**environmental factors used; lag phase of bacterial growth seldom considered.
**Industrial denial and lack of consumer confidence?
 
*Knowledge expertise on predictive microbiology and models
**2006 paper found on recent developments of models that take into account the previous problems - can we apply it as an output to stimulate cell growth?
**Input parameters: only considering temperature at the moment, and potentially pH (pH is important for the Pseudomonads spp.)
**How are we going to go about testing the purported meat spoilage model?
 
 
====Notes====
 
 
 
 
====References====
 
<biblio>
#1 pmid=8913810
#2 T.A. McMeekin, Predictive microbiology: Quantitative science delivering quantifiable benefits to the meat industry and other food industries, Meat Science, Volume 77, Issue 1, September 2007, Pages 17-27
#3 K. Koutsoumanis, P.S. Taoukis and G.J.E. Nychas, Development of a safety monitoring and assurance system for chilled food products, International Journal of Food Microbiology 100 (2005), pp. 253–260.
#4 pmid=8913812
#5 pmid=16391034
#6 pmid=2404279
 
 
</biblio>
 
==Useful Techniques==
=== Cell self-destruction ===
This is something we might be using, but not the project itself.
This is something we might be using, but not the project itself.


=== Working with Yeast ===
==== Working with Yeast ====
Yeast, unlike bacteria, is an eukaryote, and thus is able to synthesis a wider range of proteins, and is also more suitable for integrating into humans.
Yeast, unlike bacteria, is an eukaryote, and thus is able to synthesis a wider range of proteins, and is also more suitable for integrating into humans.


=== Working with Lactobacillus Casei Shirota ===
==== Working with Lactobacillus Casei Shirota ====
The fact that this bacteria is ingestible and extremely helpful to our digestive system, is a widely known fact. This can aid in commercialisation and integration into the food market, much better than a model bacteria E.coli. Also, it can be genetically engineered to make vitamins and essential amino acids that would allow many vitamin defciencies in third world countries to be solved.  
The fact that this bacteria is ingestible and extremely helpful to our digestive system, is a widely known fact. This can aid in commercialisation and integration into the food market, much better than a model bacteria E.coli. Also, it can be genetically engineered to make vitamins and essential amino acids that would allow many vitamin defciencies in third world countries to be solved.  


=== Exo/endocytotic bacteria ===
==== Exo/endocytotic bacteria ====
Keeping the idea. Different application needed, possibly similar to the [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Ideas#2._Potential_Projects|vacuum cleaner proposal]]
Keeping the idea. Different application needed, possibly similar to the [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Ideas#2._Potential_Projects|vacuum cleaner proposal]]
<br>
<br>
Treat diabetes by releasing insulin at high glucose levels and taking up insulin at low glucose levels<br>
Treat diabetes by releasing insulin at high glucose levels and taking up insulin at low glucose levels<br>


 
====Characterization of a Chassis====
===Characterization of a Chassis===
1. Rate of replication
1. Rate of replication
<br>2. Plasmid permeability
<br>2. Plasmid permeability
Line 237: Line 79:
<br>12. Cell-cell communication
<br>12. Cell-cell communication


=== Characterization of Basic Parts of a Biobrick===
==== Characterization of Basic Parts of a Biobrick====
====Promoter/Sensor====
=====Promoter/Sensor=====
Sensitivity
Sensitivity
Specificity
Specificity
Line 245: Line 87:
Saturation range/kinetics
Saturation range/kinetics
Inducible/repressible
Inducible/repressible
====Operator====
=====Operator=====
Other regulatory factors (methylation, sigma factors)
Other regulatory factors (methylation, sigma factors)
Length of gene
Length of gene
Physical conditions (contraints)
Physical conditions (constraints)
====Gene of interest====
=====Gene of interest=====
Codon optimization
Codon optimization
Length
Length
Line 256: Line 98:
Accessibility (e.g.RBS)
Accessibility (e.g.RBS)
Fusion Protein
Fusion Protein
====Reporter====
=====Reporter=====
Light intensity (analogue signal)
Light intensity (analogue signal)
Response time and fucntion
Response time and fucntion
Line 265: Line 107:
POPs
POPs


===1. Engineering V Approach ===
====1. Engineering V Approach ====
 
Initially we set out, using the engineering V approach, to determine what we wanted our project to achieve.
Initially we set out, using the engineering V approach, to determine what we wanted our project to achieve.
<br>
<br>
Line 283: Line 124:
*Time limits of project
*Time limits of project


== Notes on Brainstorming Techniques ==
==== K.O. K12 strains ====
 
* Brainstorming sessions work best if there is a specific problem or opportunity statement to guide the thinking, that describes what is to be achieved or investigated. However, the statement must not hint at the type of solution, as this may hinder idea generation. It is often suggested that thinkers not look into other solutions to the problem before brainstorming, as this tends to restrict the line of thinking to already existing solutions and results in similar answers.
* Appointing a ''facilitator'' also aids in the process. This person should state the objective, keep track of time, and make sure the session rules are obeyed. They must ensure that the session runs smoothly, that participants feel comfortable, that everyone participates, and they will also rekindle the creative process if it slows down. The facilitator position is sensitive, though. It is often prudent to appoint a person from outside the group, without a vested interest, biased point of view, or complicated relation to other members of the group.
* Participants should be encouraged to develop each others ideas further, or to use other ideas to create new ones. However, single ideas should not be discussed for too long.
* Plenty of paper and pens should be available for writing down thoughts. All thinkers should have a writing pad, and if possible, flip-charts should be within easy reach for everyone. All ideas should be written down, without discrimination.
* An enthusiastic, uncritical attitude should be encouraged - it must be ensured that no one criticises or evaluates ideas during the session. Criticism adds an element of risk to proposing new ideas, and this stifles the creativity and flow of the session. In no way should participants be made to feel criticised, uncomfortable, or threatened (i.e. mean looks, derogatory jokes, imposing body language, supervisors hovering behind participants, etc. should all be avoided.)
* The environment and arrangement of participants will also affect the process. Richer environments tend to produce better sessions than bland ones, but distractions should be avoided. Participants should, ideally, sit around a circular table, such that each individual has an equal standing and no one becomes the focus of attention by virtue of their position (that is, avoid having a 'head of table').
* Having random material such as books, magazines, toys, strange objects, etc. may help rekindle the process if it slows down, or offer a source of inspiration. However, participants must not spend too much time with these - ten or twenty seconds should be enough, but more may interfere with focus.
 
For those who want to read more about brainstorming, the following references were useful. In particular, the Wikipedia article linked below gives a very good overview of the process, and of a few different methods to conduct a session.
 
==== References ====
 
[http://www.brainstorming.co.uk/tutorials/preparingforbrainstorming.html Brainstorming.co.uk] <br>
[http://www.mindtools.com/brainstm.html Mindtools.com] <br>
[http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/brainstorming.html UNC.edu] <br>
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainstorming Wikipedia]
 
== Discarded Ideas ==
====[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/pH Buffering Machine|pH Buffering Machine]]====
 
For more information, follow the link above to the pH Buffering Machine page.
 
==== Biofilm Formation ====
===== Applications =====
 
*Mesh Application : Form biofilms on a mesh and use our system to detect when formation is complete
 
*Anti-Barnacle Coating on ships : Can use our system to maintain growth of biofilm which will secrete chemical when it comes in contact with a barnacle / mussel.  Mechanism is complex
**Mussels can't attach to hydrophobic substances (http://www.calpoly.edu/~deastlic/surface_chem/home.html)
 
*Make garbage smell nice !
**smell of garbage/landfill [http://www2b.abc.net.au/science/k2/stn/archives/archive6/newposts/32/topic32752.shtm garbagesmell]<br>Potential use in ensuring the landfill doesn't leak into soil
 
=====Basic Technology=====
 
[[image:ICGEMS_sys_QuorumToggleSwitch.png|thumb|right|500px|Toggle Switch]]
*The core technology of our device has already been developed by Boston Unversity in 2004.<sup>13</sup><br>
*The toggle switch is a bistable system for which transitions can be induced by degrading or introducing antagonistic molecules.<br>
*Switching between the high lambdaCI and high LacR regions is brought about by increasing the lambdaCI decay rate or the LacR production rate.(lambdaCI codes for lambdaci , lacI codes for LacR)<br>
*In our system expression of lacI gene is based on the quorum sensing pathway V.fischeri, in short the greather the concentration of AHL molecules the grater the expression of LuxR.  This process is illustrated to the right.<br>
 
<br clear="all">
 
=====Potential Targets For Regulation =====
We have looked through a variety of literature concerning biofilms and have identified three possible genetic targets to regulate in order to control biofilm formation:
# The genes required for formation of proteins involved in the initial attachment of microorganisms to a surface.
# The genes required for the formation of the exopolysacchorides that are secreted from the microorganisms.
# The genes that are involved in the regulation of these two systems. These really are the regulatory pathways involved.
 
After looking at both various points of regulation we looked in more detail at specific genes and in particular any knock out studies that have shown their affect on biofilm formation.
 
=====Regulatory pathways=====
Two component systems are key for biofilm formation. There are a variety of examples, three which seemed to be important are:
# BarA/UvrY
# Cpx
# EnvZ/OmpR
We looked at the BarA/UvrY in detail and this is described below.
=====BarA/uvrY Pathway:=====
BarA/uvrY are a two component system found in E.coli cells. The BarA and uvrY are involved in the regulation of csrA (carbon storage regulator). CsrA is a repressor of biofilm formation, because it is a RNA binding protein that binds to the mRNA of PSG. PSG is a key molecule that is involved in three processes;
#solid surface attachments.
#cell-cell adhesion.
#stabilisation of biofilm.
The role of BarA and uvrY in the regulation of csrA is that it is involed in the autoregulation of CsrA, that is to say that CsrA autoregulates itself through this two component system. The way that CsrA does this is to activate the transcription of a CsrB RNA. Looking at the literature on this area we have identifies several possible genes that we could try to control.
#CsrA could be regulated under a inducible promoter, however, if this was the case we need to consider the activation of csrB by the BarA/urvY pathway.
#Try to interact with the autoregulation of CrsA
However, the CrsA also controls several other key processes in the cell, including;
*glycogen biosynthesis, catabolism and gluconeogenosis,
Interfering with these pathways could have more adverse affects than biofilms. However, a study done on K12 mutants showed that the only affects of knocking out the BarA/UrvY is to increase the sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide and to alter the carbon utilization response of the E.coli.
 
=====wcaF<sup>9</sup>=====
In a studied based on K-12 strains of E.Coli the gene wcaF needs to be expressed for the mature development (3D) of Biofilm. The wcaF<sup>9</sup> is not involved in the initial binding of the E.Coli to the surface but appears to be important after the binding of the surface. The fact that the expression  of wcaF is induced by binding of a surface also inicated this.
A recent study compared a strain where the wcaF (wcaF<sup>-1</sup>) had been knocked out to a wild-type E.coli (wcaF<sup>+1</sup>) . It was found that the mutant had decreased formation of biofilms. It was only after a given time ~100hours, that the biofilm reached the same level as when wcaF was present. What was clear was that in the wcaF<sup>-1</sup> the typical architecture of the wild types biofilm was not present and that as a result the biofilms were less structurally stable.
We propose to use this wcaF gene  in a wcaF<sup>-1</sup> E.coli strain to allow regulation of the biofilm formation. Using this wcaF we will not be able to control the intial attachment, but will be able to control the speed and the architecture at which the biofilm forms.
 
 
===== Control of Two-Component Systems =====
A reaccuring problem with trying to control the formation of biofilms with the two-component systems is that biofilm formation is only one of many affects downstream of these systems. So, by regulating these two-component systems we will be affecting a greater diversity of cellular function. For this reason we decided to pursue the exopolysacchoride secretions.
 
=====Exopolysacchoride production=====
One of the key components of exopolysacchorides is the production of colanic acid. We thought that if we can try to control the formation of this then we will be able to limit the growth of a biofilm. We identified a particular gene WcaF[9] that encodes an acytl transferase which is important in the formation of colanic acid from metabolites.
 
=====References:=====
 
<biblio>
#5 pmid=10498711
#6 pmid=14569285
#7 pmid=11958566
#8 pmid=11830644
#9 [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01061.x HarvardPaper1998]
#10 [http://www.springerlink.com/content/nu7l5872458m14xr/ SurfacePropertiesAffectingBacterialAdhesion]
#11 pmid=12142477
#12 pmid=15159530
#13 pmid=10852895
#14 [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03815.x RcsCpathway]
#15 pmid=15916613
#16 [http://www.eastman.ucl.ac.uk/research/MD/biofilms_ecology_models/index.html ConstantDepthFilmFermentor]
#17 pmid=12897016
#18 pmid=11473319
#19 [http://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/227 BarnacleAdhesiveProteins]
#20 [http://www.springerlink.com/content/9mvjl1h4dqhkb0wb/ BreakdownOfBarnacleAdhesiveProteins]
#21 pmid=16330045
</biblio>
===== K.O. K12 strains =====
[http://cgsc2.biology.yale.edu/Mutation.php?ID=89616| UvrY deletion to knock out the two component system BarA/uvrY]
[http://cgsc2.biology.yale.edu/Mutation.php?ID=89616| UvrY deletion to knock out the two component system BarA/uvrY]
<br>
<br>
Line 426: Line 162:
**We then explored the idea of having a full signal, e.g. if we have a collection method we want to have a full signal to turn the system off.   
**We then explored the idea of having a full signal, e.g. if we have a collection method we want to have a full signal to turn the system off.   
<br>
<br>


[[IMAGE:IcGEM_VacuumCleanerIdea2.gif|left]]
[[IMAGE:IcGEM_VacuumCleanerIdea2.gif|left]]
Line 506: Line 241:
[[User:TomH|Tom]] 14:13, 19 July 2007 (EDT) I'm not even sure bacteria can endocytose? They don't have the machinery for it or the organelles to process it. Bacterial secretion is achieved by protein chaperones and membrane complexes as opposed to membrane budding as in eukaryotes, and uptake is achieved via passive and active protein channels. Of course you can still get diffusion across the membrane with small and hydrophobic molecules such as AHL ;)
[[User:TomH|Tom]] 14:13, 19 July 2007 (EDT) I'm not even sure bacteria can endocytose? They don't have the machinery for it or the organelles to process it. Bacterial secretion is achieved by protein chaperones and membrane complexes as opposed to membrane budding as in eukaryotes, and uptake is achieved via passive and active protein channels. Of course you can still get diffusion across the membrane with small and hydrophobic molecules such as AHL ;)
EDIT: Apologies, you never said anywhere you WOULD be using bacteria, and the fact you want to phagocytose some pathogenic ones suggest you wouldn't be!
EDIT: Apologies, you never said anywhere you WOULD be using bacteria, and the fact you want to phagocytose some pathogenic ones suggest you wouldn't be!


==== Distill seawater ====
==== Distill seawater ====
Line 567: Line 301:


==== Solar-powered bacteria ====
==== Solar-powered bacteria ====
*Requires photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria)
*Requires photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria)
**Difficult to transfer proteins into ''E.coli'', many proteins involved
**Difficult to transfer proteins into ''E.coli'', many proteins involved

Revision as of 15:38, 26 July 2007

Vincent 06:05, 3 May 2007 (EDT): You can start posting ideas about possible projects for our iGEM summer. Don't try to limit your imagination, everything is possible in the wonderful world of Synthetic Biology.

Johnsy 00:06, 6 May 2007 (EDT): Well, almost anything...good luck with your project... and if you allow me, I'll make a few comments here and there.

Baijiongjun : Looking forward to all the "WoW" ideas :P


Discarded Ideas@Imperial.iGEM2007

Feasibility criteria

We devised a feasibilty criteria to facilitate the systematic selection of ideas from our brainstorm sessions that ranged from simplistic to realistic; ambitious to ridiculous.


Brainstormings

Notes on Brainstorming Techniques

  • Brainstorming sessions work best if there is a specific problem or opportunity statement to guide the thinking, that describes what is to be achieved or investigated. However, the statement must not hint at the type of solution, as this may hinder idea generation. It is often suggested that thinkers not look into other solutions to the problem before brainstorming, as this tends to restrict the line of thinking to already existing solutions and results in similar answers.
  • Appointing a facilitator also aids in the process. This person should state the objective, keep track of time, and make sure the session rules are obeyed. They must ensure that the session runs smoothly, that participants feel comfortable, that everyone participates, and they will also rekindle the creative process if it slows down. The facilitator position is sensitive, though. It is often prudent to appoint a person from outside the group, without a vested interest, biased point of view, or complicated relation to other members of the group.
  • Participants should be encouraged to develop each others ideas further, or to use other ideas to create new ones. However, single ideas should not be discussed for too long.
  • Plenty of paper and pens should be available for writing down thoughts. All thinkers should have a writing pad, and if possible, flip-charts should be within easy reach for everyone. All ideas should be written down, without discrimination.
  • An enthusiastic, uncritical attitude should be encouraged - it must be ensured that no one criticises or evaluates ideas during the session. Criticism adds an element of risk to proposing new ideas, and this stifles the creativity and flow of the session. In no way should participants be made to feel criticised, uncomfortable, or threatened (i.e. mean looks, derogatory jokes, imposing body language, supervisors hovering behind participants, etc. should all be avoided.)
  • The environment and arrangement of participants will also affect the process. Richer environments tend to produce better sessions than bland ones, but distractions should be avoided. Participants should, ideally, sit around a circular table, such that each individual has an equal standing and no one becomes the focus of attention by virtue of their position (that is, avoid having a 'head of table').
  • Having random material such as books, magazines, toys, strange objects, etc. may help rekindle the process if it slows down, or offer a source of inspiration. However, participants must not spend too much time with these - ten or twenty seconds should be enough, but more may interfere with focus.

For those who want to read more about brainstorming, the following references were useful. In particular, the Wikipedia article linked below gives a very good overview of the process, and of a few different methods to conduct a session.

References

Brainstorming.co.uk
Mindtools.com
UNC.edu
Wikipedia

The iGEM Competition

Here is a list of winners in 2006. From the list, it is difficult to work out if all categories have equal weight in determining the overall winner, if some are more important than others, or if the overall winner is not selected based upon the other prizes.

Prize Categories:

  • Best Part
  • Best Device
  • Best System
  • Best Presentation
  • Best Poster
  • Best Documentation
  • Best Measurement and Part Characterization
  • Best Cooperation and Collaboration
  • Best Conquest of Adversity
  • Best Real-World Application

Now on to the list...


Cell self-destruction

This is something we might be using, but not the project itself.

Working with Yeast

Yeast, unlike bacteria, is an eukaryote, and thus is able to synthesis a wider range of proteins, and is also more suitable for integrating into humans.

Working with Lactobacillus Casei Shirota

The fact that this bacteria is ingestible and extremely helpful to our digestive system, is a widely known fact. This can aid in commercialisation and integration into the food market, much better than a model bacteria E.coli. Also, it can be genetically engineered to make vitamins and essential amino acids that would allow many vitamin defciencies in third world countries to be solved.

Exo/endocytotic bacteria

Keeping the idea. Different application needed, possibly similar to the vacuum cleaner proposal
Treat diabetes by releasing insulin at high glucose levels and taking up insulin at low glucose levels

Characterization of a Chassis

1. Rate of replication
2. Plasmid permeability
3. Type of vectors
4. How long it stays adhered to the surface
5. Suitable environmental conditions
6. Compatibiliy issues Chassis VS Biobricks
7. Structure and physical features]
8. Genome information
9. Safety issues
10. Stability and predictability
11. Life span
12. Cell-cell communication

Characterization of Basic Parts of a Biobrick

Promoter/Sensor

Sensitivity Specificity Substrates invoved Spatial patterns (intra/intercells) Saturation range/kinetics Inducible/repressible

Operator

Other regulatory factors (methylation, sigma factors) Length of gene Physical conditions (constraints)

Gene of interest

Codon optimization Length Cleavage sites POPs Accessibility (e.g.RBS) Fusion Protein

Reporter

Light intensity (analogue signal) Response time and fucntion Color Smell Spaial Patterns Protein trafficking/diffusion POPs

1. Engineering V Approach

Initially we set out, using the engineering V approach, to determine what we wanted our project to achieve.
a) Key Goals of project:

  • Application driven
  • Use recent research and knowledge

b) Considerations for applications:

  • Low cost - In terms of energy source and materials
  • Portable and can operate in vivo/in vitro
  • Safe - Need to contain our product to prevent contamination.
  • Inspire confidence in new field - Want to change current concerns and stigmas about synthetic biology.

c) Project Limitations:

  • Containment
  • Interfacing parts and our system
  • Time limits of project

K.O. K12 strains

UvrY deletion to knock out the two component system BarA/uvrY
Knock out in cpx system
Knock out in wcaF

Random Number Generator

Generating a series of random numbers from bacteria

  • A series of biobricks results in generation of a random (intensity of?) response
    • Response can be chemical, fluorescent or anything quantifiable...
  • Response generated should be totally random, not from a fixed algorithm
  • A numbering system has to be developed
  • Links can be made with electronic devices (bio-electronic interface)

Rust-preventing bacteria

Bacteria forms a protective biofilm that wraps metal, preventing it from rusting. It can also self-destruct on demand.

  • Forms protective biofilm coating around metal, possible ways of doing this include:
    • Biofilm can prevent oxygen and water contact with the metal
    • Cells are triggered to die (or enter scenescence), leaving a film of protective bacterial cell wall
    • Bacteria actively "eat up" metal oxides
  • Must be able to attach to metal
    • Adhesive proteins expressed on bacterial membrane
    • Bacterial "glue" is secreted to form extracellular matrix
  • Easily removable when required
    • Stimulus removes adhesive properties of bacteria

The Vacuum Cleaner (Sensor, Collector, Reporter)

With this done we thought about projects that fit this description

  • Biosensor
    • Initially thought about the possible inputs: Heavy metals, blood analysis, infections, gas and liquids.
    • We then identified a key consideration; that depending on the purpose of biosensor, we will want to detect either a threshold concentration or a gradient concentration.
    • We identified the devices that can be used in the genetic circuit and reasoned that a logic gate would be suitable.
    • Then we considered outputs for a biosensor: Visible, smell and sound.
  • Using Biosensor in more complicated system - Biological Vacuum Cleaner
    • Thought about coupling a biosensor with a collector. e.g. coupling a biosensor for infectious bacterium with collection via phagocytosis to eliminate threat.
    • We then explored the idea of having a full signal, e.g. if we have a collection method we want to have a full signal to turn the system off.


The Vacuum cleaner would work in the Following way :

1. Rubbish dectection: The first part of this process would be detecting whether rubbish is present in the surroundings. We plan to do this by exploiting the 2nd messenger system of the cell. When rubbish is in the area it will bind to its receptor and produce an inducer inside the cell. This inducer will cause a sensor to produce a detecable signal, eg. pH / colour, to signify the presence of rubbish.

2. Hoovering This hoovering action will continue until

3. Capacity Limit Dectection We want a way to see when our vacuum cleaner cells are full. We thought that we could employ a biphasic switch / threshold effect such that when the concentration of the inducer , equivalent to the amount of rubbish collected, reached a certain point the cell could signal to us again to let us know it can hold no more.

4. when the cells reach their limit we would try to replace them, eg. changing the bag on the vacuum cleaner. We would do all of this in a container eg. a vat to avoud contaminating the whole population of what we're trying to clean up.


Further Investigations

Dirk 07:00, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
Pros:

  • This idea has good potential applications
  • It can probably use the Hrp part in its control stage
  • It is novel - controlled removal has not been done before (apparently)

Cons:

  • The system is not generic (despite appearances). The process of collection, which would be performed by endocytosis, is very specific. Further, the collection and sensing parts would be the same. And since they are the major parts in the system, changing the target substrate would involve major changes to the system (hence not generic).
  • The system is very complicated - there are various different parts and at least two control stages.
  • There are no parts in the registry that can aid in the sensing/collecting component.
  • The target substrate needs to be identified before literature search can be done, because the sensor/collector is very specific.
  • A very complex new part will have to be characterised (the sensor/collector)
  • The 'cell is full' signalling system appears to be too difficult to conceive.
Potential Applications

We then thought about an application for such a project


This Vacuum Cleaner idea we think could be applied to the global problem of Eutrophication.

Eutrophication is the process by which excess fertiler from farmlands washes into nearby water sources eg. lakes & rivers.

The presence of fertilisers causes amplified growth of plants in said water supply.

This casuses amplified oxygen consumption which then causes death of life in water supply eg. fish.

We hope that the vacuum cleaner can clean up the fertiliser in the water source eg. using phosphorus receptors

When full we think we can flush the full vacuum cleaners and replace them with empty ones

This would all be done in a containment vessel eg. a vat

Criterion 1:

Lvl 1 - Ok - Original idea was to apply the biological vacuum cleaner to the problem of eutrophication, although we do need to focus the projects aims and targets.

Criterion 2:

Lvl 1 Ok - Project proposes to use the Hrp part and so characterisation of Hrp would be needed.

Criterion 3:

Lvl 1 Problem - If we apply the idea to eutrophication we need to identify ways to bind phosphate and nitrated. From searching on the biobricks registry there are no parts that suit this criteria.

Criterion 4:

Lvl 1 Ok - From studying past iGEMs and current projects there seems to be nothing similar to our proposal.

Criterion 5:

Lvl 1 Ok - No safety issues or ethical considerations were raised.

Criterion 6:

Lvl 1 Problem - After talking to the tutors, this idea seems to be over ambitious in the time frame that we have. To carry this idea forward we can either consider to apply this to a better characterised application or simplifying initial idea.

Johnsy 11:31, 19 July 2007 (EDT): This sounds like a really cool and interesting project from an "outsider". Perhaps try splitting up the project into a few parts, like what we did last year. For example, part I can be the detection of the substrate, part II will be the endocytosis or intake of the substrate. This project is very similar to an aspect of our project last year, except that we made our substrate as AHL. The "vacuum" part of it was the LuxR receptors which would sense the AHL and it would produce AiiA which would destroy it. So that might be one place to start. If you can find a few molecules that will give you similar characteristics, then that would be awesome!

Tom 14:13, 19 July 2007 (EDT) I'm not even sure bacteria can endocytose? They don't have the machinery for it or the organelles to process it. Bacterial secretion is achieved by protein chaperones and membrane complexes as opposed to membrane budding as in eukaryotes, and uptake is achieved via passive and active protein channels. Of course you can still get diffusion across the membrane with small and hydrophobic molecules such as AHL ;) EDIT: Apologies, you never said anywhere you WOULD be using bacteria, and the fact you want to phagocytose some pathogenic ones suggest you wouldn't be!

Distill seawater

To remove minerals and salt from water to make it potable. Requirements:

  • Ability to remove salts, especially NaCl
  • Ability to remove other micro-organisms (algae, bacteria, etc)
  • Ability to remove other minerals (metals, etc)
  • Must not add waste to the output water
  • Must be separable from the output water
  • Nutrient delivery must be done without affecting output water


Remove methane from air or cow gut

Criteria 1:

Lvl 1 OK - Proj is Application Driven

Criteria 2:

Lvl 1 OK - Proj will generate Research

Criteria 3:

Registry: Problems

P1 Parts not found in the registry

S1 Potential proteins can be extracted from methanotrophic bacteria

Literature : OK

Criteria 4:

Lvl 1 Prob - Proj not Novel

P1 Methane 'Removal' has already been attempted by industry in New Zealand (although it has not been achieved). This project has already been attempted and published in the journal: Chang, 2000.

S1 Attempt 'Removal' in a novel way. So far there is a vaccine that discourages methanogenic archaea (Major, 2000).

BIG PROBLEM : We don't have a solution yet.

Further Investigations:
Dirk 07:07, 17 July 2007 (EDT)


http://rucus.ru.ac.za/~wolfman/Essays/Cow.html

Criteria 5:
Criteria 6:

Fertilizer-producing bacteria

This is a system of bacteria that produce nitrogen-containing compounds, or plant growth factors (eg auxin). The system will probably require:

  • the necessary metabolic pathways to produce the fertilizer compounds
  • the ability to survive in nature, competing with other organisms for nutrients
  • not have a negative impact on the ecological system it is introduced into
    • probably a detailed study of the ecology would be required

(This project seems way over our abilities, as the whole ecology and 'survival in the wild' problems are difficult to overcome. They will be more science than engineering project. A proof of concept project could be done instead, but this would be much less interesting.)

Solar-powered bacteria

  • Requires photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria)
    • Difficult to transfer proteins into E.coli, many proteins involved
  • Output is glucose, application not known

Electrical Biological Interface

This is an electrode-based interface between the biological system and a computer. This might be electrode-plate reactions with an enzyme cascade, or the more exotic embedding of ions on cell membranes. For electrode plate reactions, the following is required:

  • a selective enzyme-substrate redox reaction
  • a second stage enzyme-mediator redox reaction
  • a third stage mediator-electrode redox reaction
  • the enzyme-mediator-electrode component must be physically isolated from the rest of the system, with the exception of the substrate, which can reach the enzyme
    • this may be done by a selectively permeable membrane encasing the component
  • the substrate of the enzyme must be related to a parameter we want to measure

OR if the embedded ionic proteins are used, then:

  • ion-containing proteins must be designed/found
  • we must be able to direct the location of the protein in the cell (ie, put it in the membrane, or export it)
  • we must prevent interaction with undesired elements (ie, floating ions, static electricity, etc)
  • Knowledge : Lack of pre-existing platform on which to implement this task - i.e. overambitious for a period of 9 weeks.
  • Scope : As above, too great a task for such period
  • However, novel and particularly important in terms of application - biobricks registry)

Remove heavy metals from water

This includes Mercury, Arsenic, Zinc, Lead, Cadmium, Barium, Aluminium. If we want to look at other compounds that also harm the environment, there are other examples like DDT, PCBs, and Dioxins, all of which causes animals, humans, and the environment alot of harm.

  • The bacteria must have a channel specific for absorption of these water pollutants
  • Be able to retain these in either the cell or a specific organelle
  • Must be able to harvest the bacteria easily
  • Must not have negative effects on the aquatic ecosystem

Criteria 1:

Lvl 1 OK - Project is application driven i.e. to remove harmful heavy metals.

Criteria 2:

Lvl 1 OK - Research would be needed on our particular metal binding method unless we pursue an already partially characterized heavy metal based project.

Criteria 3:

Lvl 1 Problem - Unless we use a previous project as a base then will have problems finding specific heavy metal receptors.

Criteria 4:

Lvl 1 Problem - Project is not novel, the idea of binding heavy metals either for removal or biosensing has been done before. Arsenic and iron are examples of projects based upon metal binding.

Criteria 5:

Lvl 1 Problem - Will need approval for the heavy metals used in the project. Would have to limit our choice of metals we can use e.g. lead and copper.

Criteria 6:

Lvl 1 - Without an easy part for binding of lead we would need to characterize a new part.

A bionsensor for CO

Bacteria must

  • Have a channel or receptor for interaction with CO (CO is highly soluble and diffusable and can penetrate the cell membrane easily, and receptors for these would be within the cell, instead of the cell surface membrane.)
  • It must be hypersensitive to the presense of CO in the air as CO does not exist in high concentrations in the normal air that we breathe
  • Must have a method for reporting on the presence or absense of CO. This is most probably a reporter gene, that either emits light, or changes the color of the bacteria.

Battery bacteria

This is a system that stores energy that is put into it, for later use. This may be by photosynthesis or by aggregating nutrients. Delivery of stored energy can be done through ATP production, or by releasing simple carbohydrates.

For all types, the energy would probably be stored as large polymers inside or outside the cells. So the following is required:

  • ability to create long polymers (fats, amin-acids, or carbohydrates)
  • ability to break down these polymers into single monomers, for conversion into energy
  • ability to store these polymers inside the cell, OR to retrieve them from outside the cell

For photosynthesis, the following would be required:

  • a photosynthesis pathway
    • this pathway is known to be very inefficient
    • we might be able to tweak this pathway, but it's probably very difficult
  • a good method to deliver the necessary CO2 for photosynthesis
    • CO2 must come in at a rate that can sustain the required photosynthesis rates

For aggregating nutrients already present in the solution, the system would have to be able to:

  • find and pick up the necessary nutrients for polymerisation
  • a method for efficient delivery of nutrients to target cells is necessary
    • it could be that simply putting nutrients in solution is enough
    • or a directed stream might be used instead

Make use of proton pumps e.g. ATPase


Problems: Can be done using Rhodoferax ferrieducens, but is not synthetic biology - no need for If implemented using E.coli, need to modify the membrane proteins - has been attempted but yielded low efficiency No parts in registry Research has been done on the field - not very novel Open ended research, no concrete solution to problem

Vitamin-producing bacteria

With regards to the requirements below, assume that only one vitamin is in context here. This type of bacteria can solve the major vitamin deficiency problems in third world countries e.g. Vitamin A deficiency. One way of utilising these bacteria is by ingesting them such that they would stay in the gut. E.coli would fail this purpose of ingestion as gaining the acceptance of the public would be hard. Hence, it would be ideal to find another bacteria that humans have already accept as a friendly bacteria. One good example would be the Yakult bacteria Lactobacillus. Though it is not characterized well, we can simply use it as a test system.

  • Preferably adhere to the gut wall and maintain an approximate constant population
  • Does not compete with the existing microflora. If the bacteria medium is lactobacillus, the more the merrier (tentatively speaking)
  • Must be able to detect a lack in the vitamin, and synthesize more of it.
  • Must have a feedback loop that prevents overproduction of the vitamin (too much of a vitamin can cause diseases too)
  • Must have a generic operating gene system whereby any vitamins can be synthesized as long as the genes coding for the sensor and final product (the vitamin)are swapped.

http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?id=68451-campina-nizo-food-research-riboflavin-yoghurt

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TB0-4JG5FH4-3&_user=217827&_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2006&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000011279&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=217827&md5=c1e32119c8b9c2218bc31a8f985025aa

http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?n=56365-bacteria-offer-novel

Bacterial lamp

Yes..? More information required.

Make use of bioluminescence of Vibrio fischeri or Firefly

Light Glowing Furniture

Cultivating bacteria

Idea is not new, and has been gaining momentum the past few years.

Bacteria that prevent eutrophication

Needs clearer definition. Algae or nitrates ?

This is a system of bacteria that EITHER kills and removes algae from water, OR removes the nutrients that algae require for growth. In both cases, the system will probably require:

  • the ability to survive in nature, competing with other organisms for nutrients
  • not have a negative impact on the ecological system it is introduced into
    • probably a detailed study of the ecology would be required
  • the bacteria must not create a similar problem to that of algae (ie, remove algae, but cause eutrophication through other means).

(This project seems way over our abilities, as the whole ecology and 'survival in the wild' problems are difficult to overcome. They will be more science than engineering project. A proof of concept project could be done instead, but this would be much less interesting.)

For removal of algae, the system will require:

  • the ability to target algae cells
  • the ability to break them down OR the ability to bind and separate them from water
    • a fixed structure that selectively binds algae cells can be assembled

For removal of nutrients, the system will require:

  • the ability to process nutrients into a form not useable by algae

Fat Absorbing Bacteria

Research industrial applications.


This bacteria can be placed in the gut and absorb the fats that are present in our food. This can be a dieting breakthrough!

Trap CO2 from the atmosphere

Off

Biofilm wrapping for food

Off

Biofilm over tissue for repairs

Off

Biofuels

Off

Bacteria that make coffee fresh

Off

Memory

Off

Artificial bacteria

Off

Degrading plastic

Off

Biochip

Off

Cell programming

Off

Autoimmune disease

Off

Target cancer cells

Off

Water-retaining bacteria

OFF
Bacteria to capture water and store water as crystals in the top soil

pH-controller bacteria

OFF To prevent adverse effects of acid rain on the soil

Air-freshener bacteria

OFF
Bacteria to take up unpleasant stench

Fat-absorbing bacteria

OFF
Used to cure heart diseases, clear arterial blockage

Mucus-eating bacteria

OFF
Prevents asthma attack, clear mucus to prevent narrowing of windpipe

Gobbler bacteria

OFF

Eat Influenza virus or HIV virus

A Driving Sensor

OFF
A device that not only reacts to the ongoings in a system (sensor) but also is able to control the same parameters in the system (controller)

A Bacteria Made Meal

OFF
By adding bacteria to a block of wood, the cellulose in the wood would be digested to an edible form for human consumption.

Minimal Bacteria Frame

OFF
Instead of building an artificial bacteria from scratch, we can minimise the housekeeping genes of a bacterium such that most of the biobrick systems would be able to intergrate easily into it without worrying about excessive crosstalking between protein components.

Farts that smell like Bananas

OFF
A gut bacteria can be engineered to become a biosensor for e.g. a lack of nutrients, and produce a certain small as an indication.

Another measurement tool for gene expression other than PoPs

OFF
This will enable more versatility between the biobricks system and generic inputs and outputs.

Another more expressive cell component other than gene expression

OFF
Gene expression can be rather slow and tedious due to the time lag of activation, transription and translation. In the case of a biosensor, if another method can be found that is able to react faster to the inputs applied, it would be an advancement in the field of synthetic biology.

Characterization of different parts of a gene and type of organism used

OFF
This is the essential crux of synthetic biology.

Fragrant bacteria/biosensor in the mouth

OFF
This is similar to the one above " Farts that smell like Bananas ".

Bacteria that neutralises greenhouse gases (cows)

OFF

Once again, a gut bacterium can be altered, or a bacterium can be made to absorb and breakdown CO, CO2, or polymerize methane.