IGEM:IMPERIAL/2009: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Killswitch guys, I think perhaps looking into recombinases as opposed to restriction enzymes would be useful as they won't act on host DNA. [http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/72/4/2520 Xer and Dif sites] will recombine with themselves in presence of the required enzyme, excising any genes between them - you could flank genes with them, then express the enzyme to chop your construct up. Sites are required to be within ≈5kb of each other, I think, so random ones on host DNA shouldn't be affected. It might take a while to work so look into the time; could be useful as a fallback, anyway. | Killswitch guys, I think perhaps looking into recombinases as opposed to restriction enzymes would be useful as they won't act on host DNA. [http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/72/4/2520 Xer and Dif sites] will recombine with themselves in presence of the required enzyme, excising any genes between them - you could flank genes with them, then express the enzyme to chop your construct up. Sites are required to be within ≈5kb of each other, I think, so random ones on host DNA shouldn't be affected. It might take a while to work so look into the time; could be useful as a fallback, anyway. | ||
Biobrick images you can use if you need (advisors like named/labelled circuit diagrams!): [[Image:P.png]] [[Image:R.png]] [[Image:G.png]] [[Image:T.png]] | |||
~ [[User:Tom Adie|Tom Adie]] 15:44, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | ~ [[User:Tom Adie|Tom Adie]] 15:44, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:24, 20 July 2009
ToDo & Deadlines
<html><center><iframe src="http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?mode=WEEK&showTitle=0&showCalendars=0&height=600&wkst=2&bgcolor=%23ffffff&src=imperial.igem09%40googlemail.com&color=%23A32929&ctz=Europe%2FLondon" style=" border-width:0 " width="800" height="600" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></center></html>
Useful Links
Wiki Updates
- N
- This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
- m
- This is a minor edit
- b
- This edit was performed by a bot
- (±123)
- The page size changed by this number of bytes
25 April 2024
Synthetic Biology @ Imperial
- Institute of Systems and Synthetic Biology
- Center of Synthetic Biology (press release)
- Synthetic Biology Course @ Imperial
iGEM resources
Advisor Contributions
Schumann lab from Uni. Beyreuth, DE have done some interesting work on using spores to direct antigens to the gut - to act as vaccines. Sporulation guys might also be interested in this paper, describing the B. sub coat protein (and how it's hilariously complex but not all required). Oh, and subtilis spores will germinate in the gut (probably), justifying using the killswitch!
Killswitch guys, I think perhaps looking into recombinases as opposed to restriction enzymes would be useful as they won't act on host DNA. Xer and Dif sites will recombine with themselves in presence of the required enzyme, excising any genes between them - you could flank genes with them, then express the enzyme to chop your construct up. Sites are required to be within ≈5kb of each other, I think, so random ones on host DNA shouldn't be affected. It might take a while to work so look into the time; could be useful as a fallback, anyway.
Biobrick images you can use if you need (advisors like named/labelled circuit diagrams!): 
~ Tom Adie 15:44, 20 July 2009 (EDT)
<html>
<!-- Start of StatCounter Code --> <script type="text/javascript"> var sc_project=4444613; var sc_invisible=1; var sc_partition=55; var sc_click_stat=1; var sc_security="fb1ae6cb"; </script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.statcounter.com/counter/counter.js"></script><noscript><div class="statcounter"><a title="blogger counter" href="http://www.statcounter.com/blogger/" target="_blank"><img class="statcounter" src="http://c.statcounter.com/4444613/0/fb1ae6cb/1/" alt="blogger counter" ></a></div></noscript> <!-- End of StatCounter Code --> </html>
