IGEM:Virginia/2012/Notebook/Genetically engineered bacteriophage for diagnosis of whooping cough/2012/07/29
From OpenWetWare
< IGEM:Virginia/2012/Notebook/Genetically engineered bacteriophage for diagnosis of whooping cough | 2012 | 07(Difference between revisions)
(Autocreate 2012/07/29 Entry for IGEM:Virginia/2012/Notebook/Genetically_engineered_bacteriophage_for_diagnosis_of_whooping_cough) |
Current revision (20:22, 3 October 2012) (view source) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{|{{table}} width="800" | {|{{table}} width="800" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| - | |style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> | + | |style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> Week 10</span> |
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html> </html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}} | |style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html> </html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
| - | == | + | ==(7/29 – 8/4)== |
| - | + | We found that the colonies grew on the negative control LB/Km plate for the | |
| + | transformation. It could be due to contamination. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | We then plated RB50 and RB53 on LB/strep/gen+ plate | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Our Gibson Assembly did not work. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | We ordered primers and optimized hCG through IDT | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Did our PCR cleanup on PET30a to remove contaminants | ||
Current revision
Week 10
| Main project page Previous entry Next entry
|
(7/29 – 8/4)We found that the colonies grew on the negative control LB/Km plate for the
transformation. It could be due to contamination.
| |




