KP Ramirez Week 13: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
*[[Media:DecAIvsPGfold-Criterion7-GO.txt| Criterion 7 Decreased AI vs Pg fold]] | *[[Media:DecAIvsPGfold-Criterion7-GO.txt| Criterion 7 Decreased AI vs Pg fold]] | ||
==Top 10 Results== | |||
'''Criterion 0''' | |||
{{Kevin A Paiz-Ramirez}} | {{Kevin A Paiz-Ramirez}} |
Revision as of 10:43, 20 April 2010
Running GenMAPP
This began when i finished formatting my excel sheet and converting it into a Tab-Delimited txt file. After this I launched the GenMAPP program and loaded my Gene Database HS. This was followed by using the expression dataset menu and selecting my tab delimited file. After this GenMAPP began converting the raw expression data.
My number of errors was 1792
The next step was labeling in the legend how we were corresponding our data into GenMAPP. Since we were working with 4 different folds: HvsPG, MetvsPG, HvsMet, and AIvsPG. This corresponded to 8 different criteria on the Expression dataset manager. Increased HvsPGfold >.25 AND HvsPGTtest <.05 Decreased HvsPGfold <-.25 AND HvsPGTtest <.05 Increased MetvsPGTest >.25 AND MetvsPG
Increased colors HvsPGfold inc=Red Opposite decreased Green MetvsPGfold inc=Brown Opposite decrease light blue HvsMetfold inc=Orange Opposite decreased light green AlVsPGfold inc=Purple Opposite blue
Grey no criteria
After this i ran MappFinder. Checking off "Gene Ontology" and "P value" as well as uploading the .gex file on the Lionshare website.
- Criterion 0 Increased H vs PG Fold
- Criterion 1Decreased H vs PG Fold
- Criterion 2 Increased Met vs PG Fold
- Criterion 3 Decreased Met vs Pg Fold
- Criterion 4 Increased H vs Met Fold
- Criterion 5 Decreased H vs Met fold
- Criterion 6 Increased AI vs PG fold
- Criterion 7 Decreased AI vs Pg fold
Top 10 Results
Criterion 0
Journal Assignments