Michael R. Pina Week 4: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
*The Biology Workbench does not seem the most user friendly, but it works just fine and gets the job done. I was able to align 4 sequences acquired from GenBank without any problems.
*The Biology Workbench does not seem the most user friendly, but it works just fine and gets the job done. I was able to align 4 sequences acquired from GenBank without any problems.
===Activity 2===
===Activity 2===
====Part 1: Looking at clustering across subjects====
My tree (linked below) shows that at the first visit, clones within each subject are clustered pretty close together which shows that there is not a lot of divergence. Subject 3 shows the most diversity from the others as it it is the furthest from the middle point.
My tree (linked below) shows that at the first visit, clones within each subject are clustered pretty close together which shows that there is not a lot of divergence. Subject 3 shows the most diversity from the others as it it is the furthest from the middle point.
====Part 2: Quantifying diversity within and between subjects====
[[Image:Mpina_table3.png]]
Table 3
[[Image:Mpina_table4.png]]
Table 4
====Files====
====Files====
[[Media:Mpina visit 1 S1 S9.txt|Visit 1, subjects 1-9]]
[[Media:Mpina visit 1 S1 S9.txt|Visit 1, subjects 1-9]]
Line 11: Line 21:


[[Media:Mpina 22196.CLUSTALW.pdf|Tree]]
[[Media:Mpina 22196.CLUSTALW.pdf|Tree]]
{{Michael R. Pina}}

Latest revision as of 09:26, 16 February 2010

Activity 1

  • The accession number of the sequence is AF016768.
  • The sequence comes from subject 1; the definition section of the record contains this information as well as other information such as which visit.
  • The Biology Workbench does not seem the most user friendly, but it works just fine and gets the job done. I was able to align 4 sequences acquired from GenBank without any problems.

Activity 2

Part 1: Looking at clustering across subjects

My tree (linked below) shows that at the first visit, clones within each subject are clustered pretty close together which shows that there is not a lot of divergence. Subject 3 shows the most diversity from the others as it it is the furthest from the middle point.

Part 2: Quantifying diversity within and between subjects

Table 3


Table 4

Files

Visit 1, subjects 1-9

Visit 1, subjects 10-15

Tree

Class Journal Entries Individual Journal Entries My Lab Notebook
Class Journal Week 2 Individual Week 2 Lab Notebook
Class Journal Week 3 Individual Week 3
Class Journal Week 4 Individual Week 4
Class Journal Week 5 Individual Week 5
Class Journal Week 6 Individual Week 6
Class Journal Week 7 Individual Week 7
Class Journal Week 8 Individual Week 8
Class Journal Week 9 Individual Week 9
Class Journal Week 10 Individual Week 10
Class Journal Week 11 Individual Week 11
Class Journal Week 12 Individual Week 12
Class Journal Week 13 Individual Week 13
Back to Main Page