OpenDocProject:DC CollectionPolicy/2010/09/28: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Autocreate 2010/09/28 Entry for OpenDocProject:DC_CollectionPolicy) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | <!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | ||
== | ==Selection Criteria== | ||
* | *'''[[User:Nic Weber|Nic Weber]] 13:47, 28 September 2010 (EDT)''': This morning I worked on selection criteria for the collection policy. I wanted to focus on language that emphasized DC's desire to collect material that was valuable, not that met a specific rubric. There are certain obstacles in laying out these criteria which include; | ||
*necessary knowledge of what metadata elements will be required for deposit | |||
*what the copyright status of a deposit should be, and what are the components of the deposit agreement | |||
*who will apply these criteria (or what to call this group...curators? a selection team?) | |||
A larger question remains about how to disambiguate selection, acquisition and appraisal. These terms are often conflated in collection policies, and I'm not sure we've defined exactly what we mean by their use. | |||
Revision as of 10:47, 28 September 2010
 Project name
|
<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Selection Criteria
A larger question remains about how to disambiguate selection, acquisition and appraisal. These terms are often conflated in collection policies, and I'm not sure we've defined exactly what we mean by their use.
| |
