|
Please post any topics you would like the SC to consider at the next meeting -- you don't need to be on the committee to post something here!
Next Meeting: April 4th 2007 @ Noon EST ONLINE!
If you want to call in, please call 617-324-7520 or sip:sc@openwetware.org (Also, you can participate in the meeting online by joining the chat here)
- OpenWetWare:Reviews (jason)
- pligg (john)
- OpenWetWare:Software/Feature requests, OpenWetWare:Ideas, OpenWetWare:To do list - with full time employees coming online the SC needs to establish a way to create a prioritized feature list so they know what's most relevant to work on (jason)
- Lucks 19:35, 1 April 2007 (EDT): Has anyone published a PLoS paper? On the publishing front, I think it would be very interesting to 'wikify' a PLoS paper. A link could be given to the main PLoS paper for a standard, citeable piece of work. The wikified version of the paper could contain additional links to more detailed investigations, etc.
- Should the Help page feature more prominently on the front page? Or the getting started tutorial sufficient? (Reshma)
- In what ways could scientific contributions (e.g. protocols, SOPs, etc) be specifically encouraged to be shared through OWW? Are there ways of creating strong incentives for scientist to contribute in this aspect, in addition to providing the benefits of a collaborative platform through the OWW wiki?--Ranta 10:23, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
- I would like all information processing for Polony sequencing to be repeatable--potentially with different parameters--through Freelogy.org. Investigators who use the Freelogy LIMS--specifically for Polony sequencing--should be able to generate publication quality figures directly from the LIMS. One condition of using Freelogy.org might be that all wet-protocols etc. *must* be published on OWW on publication. I'd love to talk more about how to make this work. --Await 08:08, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
- tell your friends about OpenWetWare:Hiring (sri)
Browse archive
|
