Reviews: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(74 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''Moved from [[OpenWetWare:Ideas]] page:''
[[Image:Oww Reviews.png]]
==OpenWetWare Reviews==


Jasonk 09:26, 6 October 2006 (EDT): Along the lines of adopt-a-protocol, it might be great to have adopt a topic area as well. Basically, trying to solve the problem of review articles always being out of date. It seems like the job of writing reviews would be much simpler if it was done on the fly as new papers came out. THat way when a new paper came accross your desk in the area you review you could read it, and then add the relevant details and the reference to the OWW Review page. This is in contrast to coming back to that same paper a year later when you're asked to write a review and having to re-read it, re-analyze it, etc. Seems like a win-win for the both the review-writer (less work) and the readers (who get a more up-to-date source.)
OpenWetWare Reviews is an experiment in providing always up-to-date scientific reviews. When a new publication comes out it can be easily incorporated into the review by OWW editors. This should be a win-win for both the review-writer (less work) and the readers (who get a more up-to-date resource).  We'll be trying reviews with a 'curator' (as discussed for [[Consensus protocol|consensus protocols]]) as well as ones without. 
*[[List:Reviews|Join the mailing list]] to discuss OWW Reviews (reviews at openwetware.org)


'''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 09:43, 26 February 2007 (EST):''' I think this might be worthtrying out with the 'curator' approach we discussed for [[Consensus protocols|Consensus protocol]].
==Current Reviews==
*[[Reviews:Directed evolution/Library construction]]
*[[Reviews:Synthetic biology]]
*[[Optimality In Biology]]


==Next steps==
==Want to help out?==
*[[Reviews:FAQ]]
*[[Reviews:Community portal]]
*[[Reviews:About]]
 
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 07:42, 22 February 2008

OpenWetWare Reviews

OpenWetWare Reviews is an experiment in providing always up-to-date scientific reviews. When a new publication comes out it can be easily incorporated into the review by OWW editors. This should be a win-win for both the review-writer (less work) and the readers (who get a more up-to-date resource). We'll be trying reviews with a 'curator' (as discussed for consensus protocols) as well as ones without.

Current Reviews

Want to help out?