User:Meng Xiao He/Notebook/fall08/2009/01/07

From OpenWetWare

< User:Meng Xiao He | Notebook | fall08 | 2009 | 01(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(PCR from yesterday)
Current revision (13:36, 8 January 2009) (view source)
(PCR from yesterday)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
==PCR from yesterday==
==PCR from yesterday==
 +
Phusion runs were with the outer primer set (only the specific pair, no others), Platinum runs were with X over primer set
 +
[[Image:2009-01-07_pcr.jpg]]
[[Image:2009-01-07_pcr.jpg]]
*1st block conditions: Phusion, 12-8 program, unmodified
*1st block conditions: Phusion, 12-8 program, unmodified
*2nd block conditions: 3% DMSO + Phusion, in gradient thermocycler under '''1-6DMSO''', seems to work much better
*2nd block conditions: 3% DMSO + Phusion, in gradient thermocycler under '''1-6DMSO''', seems to work much better
-
*3rd block conditions: Platinum
+
*3rd block conditions: Platinum, with Xover primer set
===Rerun===
===Rerun===
The following from above were rerun:
The following from above were rerun:

Current revision

Main project page       Constants
Previous entry      Next entry

PCR from yesterday

Phusion runs were with the outer primer set (only the specific pair, no others), Platinum runs were with X over primer set

Image:2009-01-07_pcr.jpg

  • 1st block conditions: Phusion, 12-8 program, unmodified
  • 2nd block conditions: 3% DMSO + Phusion, in gradient thermocycler under 1-6DMSO, seems to work much better
  • 3rd block conditions: Platinum, with Xover primer set

Rerun

The following from above were rerun:

  • lane 1: cco # 34
  • lanes 20-30: cco (18, 21, 30, 31, 32), cbb (25, 26, 27, 28, 29)

Image:2009-01-07_rerun2.jpg

The lane order is the same as in the bullets, except for the first 3 lanes, which has cco#18 > cco#34 > cco#21

  • lane 1 (cco#18) and lane 6 (cco#31) are the only candidates for loss> there does appear to be banding of some sort > Xover primer set nested PCR candidate
  • lane 5 not explained: did not lose WT copy, and lower band not right size for flanks
Personal tools